Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;44(6):853-858. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.093. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
To evaluate the surgical and functional outcomes of a matched-paired series of on-clamp vs off-clamp endoscopic robot-assisted simple enucleation (ERASE) and standardized renorraphy in a tertiary referral institution, to search for predictors of functional drop after surgery and to investigate the influence of off-clamp technique in patients presenting these characteristics.
A matched-pair comparison of 120 on-clamp vs 120 off-clamp over 491 patients treated with ERASE was performed. Perioperative and functional outcomes were compared between groups.
Patients treated with on-clamp and off-clamp technique had comparable complication and positive surgical margin rate. The off-clamp group had a significantly lower eGFR drop compared to the on-clamp group at 3rd postoperative day (POD) (1% vs 7%, p = 0.0001) and at 30th POD (2.5% vs 9%, p = 0.01) from baseline. This difference lost its statistical significance at 6th month and at last follow-up (median 40 months). At multivariable analysis the Charlson comorbidity index (OR 2.06, p < 0.0001), uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR 4.13, p < 0.001) were independent predictive factors of a >15% eGFR drop from baseline to last follow-up. In a subanalysis over 64 comorbid patients, those patients who underwent off-clamp ERASE had a significantly lower eGFR drop compared to the comorbid counterpart during the whole follow-up.
The off-clamp ERASE is a safe surgical technique with a significantly lower renal function drop compared to on-clamp ERASE in the early perioperative time. Patients with comorbidity might represent a subgroup of patients having a functional benefit after off-clamp RAPN even in the long-term period.
评估在一家三级转诊医院中,经匹配的夹闭与非夹闭内镜机器人辅助单纯剜除术(ERASE)和标准化肾固定术的手术和功能结果,寻找术后肾功能下降的预测因素,并研究非夹闭技术对具有这些特征的患者的影响。
对 491 例接受 ERASE 治疗的患者进行了 120 例夹闭组和 120 例非夹闭组的配对比较。比较两组的围手术期和功能结果。
夹闭组和非夹闭组患者的并发症和阳性切缘率无差异。非夹闭组术后第 3 天(POD)(1%比 7%,p=0.0001)和第 30 天(POD)(2.5%比 9%,p=0.01)的 eGFR 下降明显低于夹闭组。这种差异在术后第 6 个月和最后随访时(中位数 40 个月)失去统计学意义。多变量分析显示,Charlson 合并症指数(OR 2.06,p<0.0001)和未控制的 2 型糖尿病(OR 4.13,p<0.001)是 eGFR 从基线到最后随访时下降>15%的独立预测因素。在超过 64 例合并症患者的亚分析中,与合并症对照组相比,行非夹闭 ERASE 的患者在整个随访期间的 eGFR 下降明显更低。
与夹闭 ERASE 相比,非夹闭 ERASE 是一种安全的手术技术,在早期围手术期肾功能下降明显更低。合并症患者可能代表非夹闭 RAPN 术后具有功能获益的亚组患者,即使在长期随访中也是如此。