Bonsignore Alessandro, Palmiere Cristian, Buffelli Francesca, Maselli Eloisa, Marzullo Andrea, Fraternali Orcioni Giulio, Ventura Francesco, De Stefano Francesco, Dell'Erba Alessandro
Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL) - Section of Legal and Forensic Medicine, University of Genova, Italy.
CURML, University Center of Legal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland.
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Apr;285:72-76. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.027. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
Attribution of death to myocarditis continues to be a controversial issue in forensic pathology, despite the existence of established histopathological criteria as well as complementary investigations. The aim of the study was two-fold: (a) to retrospectively analyse the data obtained from a series of clinical and forensic autopsies in order to assess the number of cases with death attributed to myocarditis, and (b) to reevaluate these cases in order to assess how properly the histopathological diagnosis of myocarditis conformed to established criteria and therefore how accurately these were used on the basis of all postmortem investigation findings to conclude the cause of death. 2474 clinical and forensic autopsies were taken into consideration. Myocarditis was recorded as the official, underlying cause of death in 48 cases. Of those, 8 cases were considered to accurately conform to the histopathological Dallas criteria for the presence of myocarditis and could therefore be classified as cases of fatal myocarditis. In 19 out of 48 cases, description of focal myocarditis was considered to accurately fulfill the histopathological Dallas criteria for the presence of myocarditis. However, data provided by histological analysis and virology testing result reevaluation allowed alternative causes of death to be speculated. In another 21 out of 48 cases, description of focal myocardial inflammation was considered to inaccurately meet the histopathological Dallas criteria for the presence of myocarditis. The findings of our own study appear to be in agreement with previous observations in similar study groups and highlight that since myocarditis may occur in association with many diseases, a great deal of evidence is required before settling on categorical conclusions.
尽管存在既定的组织病理学标准以及补充检查方法,但在法医学病理学中,将死亡归因于心肌炎仍是一个有争议的问题。本研究的目的有两个:(a)回顾性分析一系列临床和法医尸检获得的数据,以评估归因于心肌炎的死亡病例数量;(b)重新评估这些病例,以评估心肌炎的组织病理学诊断在多大程度上符合既定标准,以及因此根据所有尸检调查结果,这些标准在确定死亡原因时的使用准确性如何。本研究考虑了2474例临床和法医尸检。48例将心肌炎记录为官方认定的根本死因。其中,8例被认为准确符合心肌炎存在的组织病理学达拉斯标准,因此可归类为致命性心肌炎病例。在48例中的19例中,局灶性心肌炎的描述被认为准确满足心肌炎存在的组织病理学达拉斯标准。然而,组织学分析和病毒学检测结果重新评估提供的数据使人们能够推测出其他死亡原因。在48例中的另外21例中,局灶性心肌炎症的描述被认为不准确符合心肌炎存在的组织病理学达拉斯标准。我们自己的研究结果似乎与之前类似研究组的观察结果一致,并强调由于心肌炎可能与许多疾病相关联,在得出明确结论之前需要大量证据。