Grasmeyer Sarah, Madea Burkhard
Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bonn, Stiftsplatz 12, 53111, Bonn, Germany.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2015 Jun;11(2):168-76. doi: 10.1007/s12024-015-9675-7. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
The standard for the histopathologic diagnosis of myocarditis has been the Dallas criteria. Recently, immunohistochemical studies that include the specification and quantification of interstitial inflammatory cells have been proposed as the diagnostic approach for myocarditis. Cut-off limits regarding inflammatory cell numbers for the positive diagnosis of myocarditis have been recommended. However, it is unclear whether these can be applied to postmortem tissues or to infants, as they were established from endomyocardial biopsies and for adults. Nevertheless, cut-off limits for the postmortem diagnosis of myocarditis in the first year of life have been proposed. Studies using these cut-off limits identified myocarditis in a high percentage of presumed sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases. These results were re-evaluated by the present study, which examined heart specimens from infants less than 1 year of age. The study had a test group of 92 SIDS cases and a control group of 15. Myocardial tissue was examined from eight standardized locations, stained with hematoxylin-eosin and for three different immunohistochemical reagents (LCA for leukocytes, CD68 for macrophages, CD45-RO for T-lymphocytes). Histopathological assessment of the number of inflammatory cells was carried out on an aggregate of 80 mm(2) of myocardial tissue per case. Myocarditis, based on the Dallas criteria, was histologically diagnosed in only two cases. Immunohistochemical quantification revealed elevated cell counts in the SIDS group for LCA and CD45-RO. However, those differences were neither statistically significant nor clinically relevant as the mean cell counts per mm(2) were low. The density of inflammatory cells differed considerably from section to section and even within single sections. Therefore the commonly used arithmetic mean value was not diagnostically relevant, suggesting cut-off values based on the arithmetic mean value as recommended in the literature, cannot be regarded as valid. At least in infants, the diagnosis of myocarditis from autopsy tissues still requires application of the Dallas criteria. Immunohistochemical methods cannot replace the conventional diagnosis of myocarditis.
心肌炎的组织病理学诊断标准一直是达拉斯标准。最近,有人提出将包括间质炎性细胞的分类和定量在内的免疫组织化学研究作为心肌炎的诊断方法。已经推荐了关于炎性细胞数量的阳性诊断心肌炎的临界值。然而,由于这些临界值是根据心内膜心肌活检为成人建立的,所以尚不清楚它们是否适用于尸检组织或婴儿。尽管如此,已经提出了一岁以内婴儿心肌炎尸检诊断的临界值。使用这些临界值的研究在高比例的疑似婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)病例中发现了心肌炎。本研究对年龄小于1岁的婴儿心脏标本进行了检查,对这些结果进行了重新评估。该研究有一个92例SIDS病例的试验组和一个15例的对照组。从八个标准化部位检查心肌组织,用苏木精-伊红染色,并使用三种不同的免疫组织化学试剂(白细胞的LCA、巨噬细胞的CD68、T淋巴细胞的CD45-RO)染色。对每例病例80平方毫米的心肌组织总量进行炎性细胞数量的组织病理学评估。根据达拉斯标准,仅在两例中通过组织学诊断为心肌炎。免疫组织化学定量显示,SIDS组中LCA和CD45-RO的细胞计数升高。然而,这些差异在统计学上不显著,临床上也无相关性,因为每平方毫米的平均细胞计数很低。炎性细胞的密度在不同切片之间甚至在单个切片内都有很大差异。因此,常用的算术平均值在诊断上不相关,这表明文献中推荐的基于算术平均值的临界值不能被视为有效。至少在婴儿中,根据尸检组织诊断心肌炎仍需要应用达拉斯标准。免疫组织化学方法不能取代心肌炎的传统诊断。