• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙型肝炎治愈与退伍军人事务回顾性队列中肝硬化患者的医疗保健费用降低有关。

Hepatitis C Cure Is Associated with Decreased Healthcare Costs in Cirrhotics in Retrospective Veterans Affairs Cohort.

机构信息

VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Mail code L457, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

Oregon Health and Sciences University, School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1454-1462. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4956-0. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-018-4956-0
PMID:29453610
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 233,898 individuals in the Veterans Affairs healthcare network are hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected, making the Veterans Affairs the single largest provider of HCV care in the USA. Direct-acting antiviral treatment regimens for HCV offer high cure rates. However, these medications pose an enormous financial burden, and whether HCV cure is associated with decreased healthcare costs is poorly defined.

AIMS

To measure downstream healthcare costs in a national population of HCV-infected patients up to 9 years post-HCV antiviral treatment, to compare downstream healthcare costs between cured and uncured patients, and to assess impact of cirrhosis status on cost differences.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study (2004-2014) of hepatitis C-infected patients who initiated antiviral treatment within the United States Veterans Affairs healthcare system October 2004-September 2013. We measured inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs after HCV treatment.

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, cure was associated with mean cumulative cost savings in post-treatment years three-six, but no cost savings by post-treatment year nine. By post-treatment year nine, cure in cirrhosis patients was associated with a mean cumulative cost savings of $9474 (- 32,666 to 51,614) per patient, while cure in non-cirrhotic patients was associated with a mean cumulative cost excess of $2526 (- 12,211 to 7159) per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with cirrhosis at baseline, cure is associated with absolute cost savings up to 9 years post-treatment compared to those without cure. Among patients without cirrhosis, early post-treatment cost savings are counterbalanced by higher costs in later years.

摘要

背景

退伍军人事务部医疗网络中约有 233898 人感染丙型肝炎病毒(HCV),使其成为美国最大的 HCV 治疗服务提供商。直接作用抗病毒治疗方案可实现高治愈率。然而,这些药物带来了巨大的经济负担,HCV 治愈是否与降低医疗成本相关尚未明确。

目的

在 HCV 抗病毒治疗后长达 9 年的时间内,测量全国 HCV 感染患者的后续医疗成本,比较治愈和未治愈患者的后续医疗成本,并评估肝硬化状态对成本差异的影响。

方法

这是一项针对美国退伍军人事务部医疗系统中于 2004 年 10 月至 2013 年 9 月期间接受 HCV 抗病毒治疗的 HCV 感染患者的回顾性队列研究。我们测量了 HCV 治疗后的住院、门诊和药房费用。

结果

对于整个队列,治愈与治疗后第 3 至 6 年的累计成本节约相关,但在治疗后第 9 年没有成本节约。对于肝硬化患者,治疗后第 9 年的治愈与每位患者平均累计成本节约 9474 美元(-32666 美元至 51614 美元)相关,而对于非肝硬化患者,治愈与每位患者平均累计成本超支 2526 美元(-12211 美元至 7159 美元)相关。

结论

在基线时患有肝硬化的患者中,与未治愈的患者相比,治疗后 9 年内治愈与绝对成本节约相关。在无肝硬化的患者中,早期治疗后的成本节约被后期更高的成本所抵消。

相似文献

1
Hepatitis C Cure Is Associated with Decreased Healthcare Costs in Cirrhotics in Retrospective Veterans Affairs Cohort.丙型肝炎治愈与退伍军人事务回顾性队列中肝硬化患者的医疗保健费用降低有关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1454-1462. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4956-0. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
2
Treatment of hepatitis C with direct-acting antivirals significantly reduces liver-related hospitalizations in patients with cirrhosis.使用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎可显著降低肝硬化患者与肝脏相关的住院率。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;30(11):1378-1383. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001195.
3
Timing of hepatitis C antiviral therapy in patients with advanced liver disease: a decision analysis model.晚期肝病患者丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗时机:决策分析模型。
Liver Transpl. 2010 Jun;16(6):748-59. doi: 10.1002/lt.22072.
4
Hepatitis C in the era of direct-acting antivirals: real-world costs of untreated chronic hepatitis C; a cross-sectional study.直接抗病毒药物时代的丙型肝炎:未经治疗的慢性丙型肝炎的实际成本;一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 26;15:471. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1208-1.
5
Outcomes of Pharmacy-Led Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antiviral Utilization Management at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.退伍军人事务医疗中心的药学主导丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物利用管理的结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):364-369. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.364.
6
A clinician's guide to the cost and health benefits of hepatitis C cure assessed from the individual patient perspective.从个体患者角度评估丙型肝炎治愈的成本和健康效益的临床医生指南。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;29(2):208-214. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000773.
7
Cost effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral therapy for treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection in the veterans health administration.直接作用抗病毒治疗在退伍军人管理局治疗初治慢性 HCV 基因型 1 感染患者中的成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;11(11):1503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 May 22.
8
Peginterferon alfa-2a versus peginterferon alfa-2b as initial treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b作为丙型肝炎病毒感染初始治疗的比较:基于退伍军人事务医疗保健系统视角的成本效用分析
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Jun;27(6):813-24. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.6.813.
9
Impact of disease severity on healthcare costs in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) virus infection.慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)病毒感染患者疾病严重程度对医疗成本的影响。
Hepatology. 2012 Nov;56(5):1651-60. doi: 10.1002/hep.25842. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
10
An economic analysis of antiviral therapy in patients with advanced hepatitis C virus disease: still not there!晚期丙型肝炎病毒病患者抗病毒治疗的经济学分析:仍未实现!
Liver Transpl. 2010 Jun;16(6):697-700. doi: 10.1002/lt.22090.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C virus in the United States from a payer perspective.从支付者角度看美国直接作用抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒的成本效益。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Oct;28(10):1138-1148. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.10.1138.
2
Treating the Hardest to Treat: Reframing the Hospital Admission as an Opportunity to Initiate Hepatitis C Treatment.治疗最难治疗的患者:重新定义住院作为开始丙型肝炎治疗的机会。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Apr;67(4):1244-1251. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06941-3. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Hooray for the VHA! A Survey of Access and Barriers to Liver Care Among Veterans.

本文引用的文献

1
Double robust estimator of average causal treatment effect for censored medical cost data.针对截尾医疗成本数据的平均因果治疗效应的双重稳健估计器。
Stat Med. 2016 Aug 15;35(18):3101-16. doi: 10.1002/sim.6876. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
2
Cascade of Care for Hepatitis C Virus Infection Within the US Veterans Health Administration.美国退伍军人健康管理局内丙型肝炎病毒感染的连续护理
Am J Public Health. 2016 Feb;106(2):353-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302927. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
3
Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of Patients Infected With Hepatitis C Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Survival Benefit of Achieving a Sustained Virological Response.
退伍军人健康管理局万岁!退伍军人肝脏护理的获取与障碍调查。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Dec;64(12):3361-3362. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05874-2.
4
Cost/Benefit of Hepatitis C Treatment: It Does Not End with SVR.丙型肝炎治疗的成本效益:它并不随着持续病毒学应答而结束。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1376-1377. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5014-7.
丙型肝炎病毒感染患者的长期治疗结果:对实现持续病毒学应答的生存获益的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 1;61(5):730-40. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ396. Epub 2015 May 17.
4
The cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based regimens for treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 2 or 3 infection.基于索磷布韦的治疗方案用于丙型肝炎病毒2型或3型感染的成本效益
Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 5;162(9):619-29. doi: 10.7326/M14-1313.
5
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of hepatitis C virus treatment with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in the United States.索磷布韦和来迪帕司韦治疗丙型肝炎病毒在美国的成本效益和预算影响
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 17;162(6):397-406. doi: 10.7326/M14-1336.
6
Chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003 to 2010.美国慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染,2003 年至 2010 年全国健康和营养调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):293-300. doi: 10.7326/M13-1133.
7
Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection.来迪派韦索磷布韦片与索磷布韦联用治疗初治的 HCV 基因 1 型感染。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 15;370(20):1889-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402454. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
8
Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection.来迪派韦索磷布韦片治疗既往治疗的 HCV 基因 1 型感染。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 17;370(16):1483-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1316366. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
9
Cost analysis of sofosbuvir/ribavirin versus sofosbuvir/simeprevir for genotype 1 hepatitis C virus in interferon-ineligible/intolerant individuals.索磷布韦/利巴韦林与索磷布韦/西美瑞韦治疗无干扰素适应证/不耐受的 1 型丙型肝炎病毒的成本分析。
Hepatology. 2014 Jul;60(1):37-45. doi: 10.1002/hep.27151. Epub 2014 May 14.
10
Minimum costs for producing hepatitis C direct-acting antivirals for use in large-scale treatment access programs in developing countries.在发展中国家用于大规模治疗获取项目的丙型肝炎直接抗病毒药物的最低生产成本。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(7):928-36. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu012. Epub 2014 Jan 6.