Wockhardt, Global Clinical Development, BKC, Mumbai, India.
School of Pharmacy, Center for Translational Medicine, University of Maryland, 20 N. Pine Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Acta Diabetol. 2018 May;55(5):461-468. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1113-3. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
The objective of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of an insulin glargine formulation, Glaritus (test) with the innovator's formulation Lantus (reference) using the euglycemic clamp technique in a single-dose, double-blind, randomized, two sequences, four-period replicate crossover study in healthy volunteers (n = 40).
Subjects received subcutaneous administration of the insulin glargine (0.4 IU/kg) formulation at two occasions for test and reference and a 20% glucose solution was infused at variable rate to maintain euglycemia for 24 h.
Both PK [area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) and maximum insulin concentration (C)] and PD endpoints [area under glucose infusion rate time curve () and maximum glucose infusion rate (GIR)] demonstrated bioequivalence of Glaritus to Lantus with the 90% confidence interval of geometric mean ratio of test to reference entirely contained within 0.80-1.25. Both formulations showed equivalent geometric least-square mean LSM value (0.08 nmol/L) for C. The geometric LSM AUC value for Glaritus (1.09 h nmol/L) was comparable to Lantus (1.05 h nmol/L). Median T values were also identical (12 h for both), and median t1/2 values were also equal (18 h for both). For GIR, the difference between the means for the two was not statistically significant. No AEs related to study formulations were reported, and both products were well tolerated.
The test product (Glaritus) was found to be bioequivalent to the reference product (Lantus).
CTRI/2015/06/005890; http://www.ctri.nic.in/ .
本研究旨在比较甘精胰岛素制剂 Glaritus(试验)与原研药 Lantus(参比)的药代动力学(PK)和药效动力学(PD)特性,采用单次、双盲、随机、两序列、四周期重复交叉研究,在健康志愿者中(n=40)使用正葡萄糖钳夹技术。
受试者在两次接受胰岛素甘精胰岛素(0.4IU/kg)制剂治疗时,分别接受试验和参比治疗,并以不同的速度输注 20%葡萄糖溶液,以维持 24 小时的血糖正常。
PK(血浆浓度时间曲线下面积(AUC)和最大胰岛素浓度(C))和 PD 终点(葡萄糖输注率时间曲线下面积()和最大葡萄糖输注率(GIR))均显示 Glaritus 与 Lantus 具有生物等效性,试验与参比的几何均数比值的 90%置信区间完全包含在 0.80-1.25 之间。两种制剂的 C 几何均数最小二乘均数(LSM)值(0.08nmol/L)相同。Glaritus 的几何 AUC 值(1.09h nmol/L)与 Lantus 相当(1.05h nmol/L)。中位数 T 值也相同(两者均为 12 小时),中位数 t1/2 值也相等(两者均为 18 小时)。对于 GIR,两种药物之间的平均值差异无统计学意义。未报告与研究制剂相关的不良事件,两种产品均耐受良好。
受试产品(Glaritus)被发现与参比产品(Lantus)具有生物等效性。
CTRI/2015/06/005890;http://www.ctri.nic.in/。