• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小切口胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术行单纯主动脉瓣置换术后的生活质量、满意度及结局(QUALITY - AVR):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Quality of life, satisfaction and outcomes after ministernotomy versus full sternotomy isolated aortic valve replacement (QUALITY-AVR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Rodríguez-Caulo Emiliano A, Guijarro-Contreras Ana, Otero-Forero Juan, Mataró María José, Sánchez-Espín Gemma, Guzón Arantza, Porras Carlos, Such Miguel, Ordóñez Antonio, Melero-Tejedor José María, Jiménez-Navarro Manuel

机构信息

UGC Área del Corazón. Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Cardiología. Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga, Spain. Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud (FIMABIS). Universidad de Málaga. Spain. CIBERCV Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

UGC Área del Corazón, Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío de Sevilla, Red de Investigación Cardiovascular (RIC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2486-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-018-2486-x
PMID:29454380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5816540/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the last decade, the use of ministernotomy in cardiac surgery has increased. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after ministernotomy have never been compared to conventional full sternotomy in randomised trials. The aim of the study is to determine if this minimally invasive approach improves quality of life, satisfaction and clinical morbimortality outcomes.

METHODS/DESIGN: The QUALITY-AVR trial is a single-blind, single-centre, independent, and pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing ministernotomy ("J" shaped upper hemisternotomy toward right 4th intercostal space) to full sternotomy in patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis scheduled for elective aortic valve replacement. One hundred patients will be randomised in a 1:1 computational fashion. Sample size was determined for the primary end point with alpha error of 0.05 and with power of 90% in detecting differences between intervention groups of ≥ 0.10 points in change from baseline quality of life Questionnaire EuroQOL-index (EQ-5D-5 L®), measured at 1, 6 or 12 months. Secondary endpoints are: the differences in change from other baseline EQ-5D-5 L® utilities (visual analogue scale, Health Index and Severity Index), cardiac surgery specific satisfaction questionnaire (SATISCORE®), a combined safety endpoint of four major adverse complications at 1 month (all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, neurologic events and acute renal failure), bleeding through drains within the first 24 h, intubation time, postoperative hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, transfusion needs during the first 72 h and 1-year survival rates. Clinical follow up is scheduled at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months after randomization. All clinical outcomes are recorded following the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria.

DISCUSSION

The QUALITY-AVR trial aims to test the hypothesis that ministernotomy improves quality of life, satisfaction and clinical outcomes in patients referred for isolated aortic valve replacement. Statistically significant differences favouring ministernotomy could modify the surgical "gold standard" for aortic stenosis surgery, and subsequently the need to change the control group in transcatheter aortic valve implantation trials. Recruitment started on 18 March 2016. In November 2017, 75 patients were enrolled.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02726087 . Registered on 13 March 2016.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,心脏手术中微创胸骨切开术的使用有所增加。在随机试验中,微创胸骨切开术后的生活质量和患者满意度从未与传统的全胸骨切开术进行过比较。本研究的目的是确定这种微创方法是否能改善生活质量、满意度和临床病死率结局。

方法/设计:QUALITY-AVR试验是一项单盲、单中心、独立的实用随机临床试验,比较微创胸骨切开术(“J”形上半胸骨切开术至右侧第四肋间)与全胸骨切开术,用于计划进行择期主动脉瓣置换的孤立性严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者。100名患者将以1:1的计算方式随机分组。根据主要终点确定样本量,α错误为0.05,检测干预组之间从基线生活质量欧洲五维健康量表指数(EQ-5D-5L®)变化≥0.10分的差异的检验效能为90%,在1、6或12个月时测量。次要终点包括:其他基线EQ-5D-5L®效用(视觉模拟量表、健康指数和严重程度指数)的变化差异、心脏手术特异性满意度问卷(SATISCORE®)、1个月时四项主要不良并发症的综合安全终点(全因死亡率、急性心肌梗死、神经系统事件和急性肾衰竭)、术后24小时内引流管引流量、插管时间、术后住院和重症监护病房住院时间、术后72小时内输血需求以及1年生存率。临床随访计划在随机分组后的基线、1、6和12个月进行。所有临床结局均按照瓣膜学术研究联盟2标准记录。

讨论

QUALITY-AVR试验旨在检验以下假设:微创胸骨切开术可改善计划进行孤立性主动脉瓣置换患者的生活质量、满意度和临床结局。支持微创胸骨切开术的具有统计学意义的差异可能会改变主动脉瓣狭窄手术的外科“金标准”,并随后改变经导管主动脉瓣植入试验中的对照组。招募工作于2016年3月18日开始。2017年11月,已招募75名患者。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02726087。于2016年3月1日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f3b/5816540/4c49658bef87/13063_2018_2486_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f3b/5816540/57858fca81d4/13063_2018_2486_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f3b/5816540/4c49658bef87/13063_2018_2486_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f3b/5816540/57858fca81d4/13063_2018_2486_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f3b/5816540/4c49658bef87/13063_2018_2486_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of life, satisfaction and outcomes after ministernotomy versus full sternotomy isolated aortic valve replacement (QUALITY-AVR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.小切口胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术行单纯主动脉瓣置换术后的生活质量、满意度及结局(QUALITY - AVR):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2486-x.
2
Quality of Life After Ministernotomy Versus Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement.微创胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术主动脉瓣置换术后的生活质量。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;33(2):328-334. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Manubrium-limited ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (MAVRIC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.用于主动脉瓣置换术的胸骨柄受限小切口胸骨切开术与传统胸骨切开术的比较(MAVRIC):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jan 28;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1768-4.
4
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
5
6
Bleeding in minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement.微创与传统主动脉瓣置换术的出血比较。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jun 21;19(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02667-1.
7
Minimally invasive versus transapical versus transfemoral aortic valve implantation: A one-to-one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis.经皮球囊主动脉瓣成形术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的疗效比较
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;156(5):1825-1834. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.104. Epub 2018 May 5.
8
Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.八十岁老人单纯主动脉瓣置换术采用全胸骨切开术与右前小切口开胸术的比较:一项倾向匹配研究†
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):732-41; discussion 741. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv030. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
9
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ministernotomy Versus Minithoracotomy Approach.微创主动脉瓣置换术:胸骨上段小切口与微创开胸手术入路的成本效益分析
J Heart Valve Dis. 2015 Sep;24(5):531-9.
10
Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.经上半胸骨小切口快速植入主动脉瓣的益处。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 26;15(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01268-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimal Access Aortic Valve Surgery.微创主动脉瓣手术
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Jun 30;10(7):281. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10070281.
2
Measurement of health-related quality of life post aortic valve replacement via minimally invasive incisions.经微创切口行主动脉瓣置换术后的健康相关生活质量测量。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 26;17(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01964-x.
3
Surgical outcomes associated with partial upper sternotomy in obese aortic disease patients.肥胖主动脉疾病患者行部分胸骨上段切开术的手术结果。

本文引用的文献

1
Pragmatic Trials.实用性试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):454-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510059.
2
Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Heart Failure.患者报告结局量表在心力衰竭中的应用。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;4(3):165-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.015. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
3
A comparison of conventional surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and sutureless valves in "real-world" patients with aortic stenosis and intermediate- to high-risk profile.对“真实世界”中具有中高风险特征的主动脉瓣狭窄患者进行传统手术、经导管主动脉瓣置换术和无缝合瓣膜的比较。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 31;17(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01890-y.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;150(6):1570-7; discussion 1577-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
4
Health Status After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Increased Surgical Risk: Results From the CoreValve US Pivotal Trial.手术风险增加的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的健康状况:CoreValve美国关键试验的结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 17;8(9):1207-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.018.
5
Estimation of minimally important differences in the EQ-5D and SF-6D indices and their utility in stroke.EQ-5D和SF-6D指数中最小重要差异的估计及其在中风中的应用。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Mar 9;13:32. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0227-3.
6
A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术微创与传统胸骨切开术的荟萃分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Oct;98(4):1499-511. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
7
Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison.微创主动脉瓣置换手术与生存率提高相关:一项倾向匹配比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;47(1):11-7; discussion 17. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu068. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
8
Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.经导管主动脉瓣植入术更新的标准化终点定义:瓣膜学术研究联盟-2 共识文件。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(19):2403-18. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs255.
9
Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012).心脏瓣膜病管理指南(2012年版)
Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(19):2451-96. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
10
Health-related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) Trial (Cohort A).高危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的健康相关生活质量:PARTNER(经导管主动脉瓣置入术)试验(队列 A)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 7;60(6):548-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.075. Epub 2012 Jul 18.