Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiac Disease Center, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China.
Department of Cardiology, Nan Ping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping, 353000, People's Republic of China.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 31;17(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01890-y.
Excellent partial upper sternotomy outcomes have been reported for patients undergoing aortic surgery, but whether this approach is particularly beneficial to obese patients remains to be established. This study was developed to explore the outcomes of aortic surgical procedures conducted via a partial upper sternotomy or a full median sternotomy approach in obese patients.
We retrospectively examined consecutive acute type A aortic dissection patients who underwent aortic surgery in our hospital between January 2015 to January 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on body mass index: 'non-obese' and 'obese'. We then further stratified patients in the obese and non-obese groups into partial upper sternotomy and full median sternotomy groups, with outcomes between these two sternotomy groups then being compared within and between these two body mass index groups.
In total, records for 493 patients that had undergone aortic surgery were retrospectively reviewed, leading to the identification of 158 consecutive obese patients and 335 non-obese patients. Overall, 88 and 70 obese patients underwent full median sternotomy and partial upper sternotomy, respectively, while 180 and 155 non-obese patients underwent these respective procedures. There were no differences between the full median sternotomy and partial upper sternotomy groups within either BMI cohort with respect to preoperative baseline indicators and postoperative complications. Among non-obese individuals, the partial upper sternotomy approach was associated with reduced ventilation time (P = 0.003), shorter intensive care unit stay (P = 0.017), shorter duration of hospitalization (P = 0.001), and decreased transfusion requirements (Packed red blood cells: P < 0.001; Fresh frozen plasma: P < 0.001). Comparable findings were also evident among obese patients.
Obese aortic disease patients exhibited beneficial outcomes similar to those achieved for non-obese patients via a partial upper sternotomy approach which was associated with significant reductions in the duration of intensive care unit residency, duration of hospitalization, ventilator use, and transfusion requirements. This surgical approach should thus be offered to aortic disease patients irrespective of their body mass index.
经胸骨上段部分切开术治疗的主动脉手术患者取得了优异的结果,但这种方法是否对肥胖患者特别有益仍有待确定。本研究旨在探讨经胸骨上段部分切开术或全正中切开术治疗肥胖患者的主动脉手术结果。
我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在我院接受主动脉手术的连续急性 A 型主动脉夹层患者。根据体重指数将患者分为两组:“非肥胖”和“肥胖”。然后,我们将肥胖组和非肥胖组患者进一步分为胸骨上段部分切开术和全正中切开术组,并比较两组患者的手术结果。
共回顾了 493 例接受主动脉手术患者的记录,确定了 158 例连续肥胖患者和 335 例非肥胖患者。总体而言,88 例肥胖患者和 70 例肥胖患者接受了全正中切开术和胸骨上段部分切开术,180 例非肥胖患者和 155 例非肥胖患者分别接受了这两种手术。在 BMI 队列中,全正中切开术组和胸骨上段部分切开术组之间在术前基线指标和术后并发症方面没有差异。在非肥胖患者中,胸骨上段部分切开术与减少通气时间(P=0.003)、缩短重症监护病房住院时间(P=0.017)、缩短住院时间(P=0.001)和减少输血需求(红细胞:P<0.001;新鲜冷冻血浆:P<0.001)有关。肥胖患者也出现了类似的结果。
肥胖的主动脉疾病患者通过胸骨上段部分切开术获得了与非肥胖患者相似的有益结果,这与重症监护病房住院时间、住院时间、呼吸机使用和输血需求的显著减少有关。因此,无论患者的体重指数如何,都应向主动脉疾病患者提供这种手术方法。