Benidir Tarik, Hersey Karen, Finelli Antonio, Hamilton Rob, Joshua Anthony M, Kulkarni Girish, Zlotta Alexandre, Fleshner Neil
Uro-Oncology Research Unit, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Uro-Oncology Research Unit, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Urol Oncol. 2018 May;36(5):240.e13-240.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
Several new compounds are now available for castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Individual costs range between $40,000 and $93,000 with mean survival extensions from 2.4 to 4.8 months. Currently, it remains unclear how patients with prostate cancer (PCa) value the effect of these therapies in the setting of CRPC.
To assess patient understanding of core cancer concepts, opinions on the cost and overall benefit of CRPC drugs, whether out-of-pocket costs would change opinions and whether patients would ultimately opt out of CRPC drug treatment for an end-of-life (EOL) premium.
We conducted a qualitative survey among patients with various PCa states ranging from active surveillance to CRPC and from various familial, financial and educational demographics. Through a series of hypothetical scenarios, we extrapolated opinions on CRPC drug value, efficacy and monetary worth. We assessed patient willingness to accept an EOL ($50,000) premium in lieu of CRPC drug treatment. Statistically, chi-squared analysis and Fisher's exact test were used when appropriate.
In total, 103 patients completed the questionnaire, one-half of whom did not understand "advanced PCa" state and more than one-third of the concept of palliative care despite multiple meetings with Urologists. Patients willingness-to-pay and proposed drug value was higher than that accepted by government when government funded, with costs exceeding $250,000 per person, but lower than that accepted by government when self-funded. A majority (60%) would accept/consider the EOL premium in the setting of CRPC. Patients with higher education were more skeptical about CRPC drug value and more likely to accept the EOL premium (P = 0.003.) CONCLUSION: Patients have an incomplete understanding of their own disease prognosis and its therapeutic options. This ultimately influences patient decision-making. Education, income and out-of-pocket costs diminished opinion of CRPC drugs considerably. As such, an EOL premium should be considered in subsets of patients.
目前有几种新化合物可用于去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)。个体成本在40,000美元至93,000美元之间,平均生存期延长2.4至4.8个月。目前,尚不清楚前列腺癌(PCa)患者如何看待这些疗法在CRPC背景下的效果。
评估患者对癌症核心概念的理解、对CRPC药物成本和总体效益的看法、自付费用是否会改变看法以及患者是否最终会因临终(EOL)补贴而选择不接受CRPC药物治疗。
我们对处于从积极监测到CRPC等各种PCa状态、来自不同家族、经济和教育背景的患者进行了定性调查。通过一系列假设情景,我们推断了对CRPC药物价值、疗效和货币价值的看法。我们评估了患者接受50,000美元EOL补贴以替代CRPC药物治疗的意愿。在适当情况下,使用卡方分析和Fisher精确检验进行统计学分析。
共有103名患者完成了问卷,其中一半患者不理解“晚期PCa”状态,尽管与泌尿科医生多次会面,但仍有超过三分之一的患者不理解姑息治疗的概念。患者的支付意愿和提议的药物价值在政府资助时高于政府接受的水平,每人成本超过250,000美元,但在自费时低于政府接受的水平。大多数(60%)患者在CRPC情况下会接受/考虑EOL补贴。受过高等教育的患者对CRPC药物价值更持怀疑态度,更有可能接受EOL补贴(P = 0.003)。结论:患者对自身疾病预后及其治疗选择的理解不完整。这最终影响患者的决策。教育、收入和自付费用显著降低了对CRPC药物的看法。因此,应在部分患者中考虑EOL补贴。