Suppr超能文献

黄斑手术后重返手术室:IRIS 注册分析。

Return to the Operating Room after Macular Surgery: IRIS Registry Analysis.

机构信息

VitreoRetinal Surgery, Professional Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2018 Aug;125(8):1273-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the rate of return to the operating room after vitrectomy surgery to treat macular hole or epiretinal membrane.

DESIGN

A retrospective registry cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals receiving care in ophthalmology practices participating in the Academy IRIS (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry.

METHODS

Data from the IRIS Registry were analyzed for patients who underwent vitrectomy for macular holes or epiretinal membranes. Cases were identified by the combination of International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision code (362.54, 362.56) and a current procedural terminology (CPT) code for vitrectomy surgery between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2017.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The eyes that underwent additional eye surgery within 1 year after initial vitrectomy for macular hole or epiretinal membrane were identified, as was the nature of the additional procedures per CPT code.

RESULTS

A total of 41 475 eyes underwent vitrectomy for macular hole and 73 219 eyes underwent vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane during the study period. In the macular hole group, 7573 had a second surgery within 1 year, and 2827 (6.8%) had a second surgery that was not cataract related. In the epiretinal membrane group, 12 433 had a second surgery within 1 year, 4022 (5.5%) of which were not cataract related. In the macular hole group, 4.6% of eyes returned to the operating room for another macular hole repair surgery, and 2.0% returned for retinal detachment repair. In the epiretinal membrane group, 1.4% returned for a second vitrectomy with membrane stripping, and 2.5% returned for retinal detachment repair.

CONCLUSIONS

This registry-based study encompassed a large number of patients but was limited by the inaccessibility of some information and the potential for inaccurate medical records or coding, as it obtained data from multiple electronic health records entities. Excluding cataract surgery, approximately 6% of eyes that underwent vitrectomy to address macular hole or epiretinal membrane returned for a second ophthalmic procedure within a year. In the macular hole group, most secondary non-cataract surgeries were for another macular hole repair procedure. For both macular holes and epiretinal membranes, approximately 2% of eyes required retinal detachment repair surgery within 1 year.

摘要

目的

调查接受玻璃体切割手术治疗黄斑裂孔或视网膜前膜后重返手术室的比例。

设计

回顾性登记队列研究。

参与者

在参与眼科学实践的眼科研究所(智能研究在视线)登记处接受治疗的个人。

方法

对 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日期间接受玻璃体切割术治疗黄斑裂孔或视网膜前膜的患者,通过国际疾病分类第 9 版(362.54、362.56)和当前程序术语(CPT)代码组合,对 IRIS 登记处的数据进行分析。

主要观察指标

确定初始玻璃体切割术后 1 年内再次行眼部手术的眼睛,并按 CPT 代码确定额外手术的性质。

结果

研究期间,共有 41475 只眼行玻璃体切割术治疗黄斑裂孔,73219 只眼行玻璃体切割术治疗视网膜前膜。在黄斑裂孔组中,7573 只眼在 1 年内进行了第二次手术,其中 2827 只眼(6.8%)与白内障无关。在视网膜前膜组中,12433 只眼在 1 年内进行了第二次手术,其中 4022 只眼(5.5%)与白内障无关。在黄斑裂孔组中,4.6%的眼睛因另一次黄斑裂孔修复手术返回手术室,2.0%的眼睛因视网膜脱离修复手术返回。在视网膜前膜组中,1.4%的眼睛因第二次玻璃体切割伴膜剥除返回手术室,2.5%的眼睛因视网膜脱离修复手术返回。

结论

本研究基于登记数据,纳入了大量患者,但受到一些信息不可用以及可能存在不准确的医疗记录或编码的限制,因为它从多个电子健康记录实体获取数据。排除白内障手术,约 6%接受玻璃体切割术治疗黄斑裂孔或视网膜前膜的眼睛在一年内因另一次眼科手术返回。在黄斑裂孔组中,大多数继发性非白内障手术是为了进行另一次黄斑裂孔修复手术。对于黄斑裂孔和视网膜前膜,约 2%的眼睛在 1 年内需要视网膜脱离修复手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验