Suppr超能文献

在麻醉期间进行即时药物过敏的体外诊断:文献综述。

In Vitro Diagnosis of Immediate Drug Hypersensitivity During Anesthesia: A Review of the Literature.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):1176-1184. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 14.

Abstract

Quantification of specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies constitutes an important measure to document anesthesia-related immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs). However, only a few drug-specific assays are available and their predictive value is not known. In cases of non-IgE mediated IHRs, diagnosis might benefit from cellular tests such as basophil mediator release tests and basophil activation tests (BATs). To review the potential and limitations of quantification of sIgE, mediator release, and BAT in anesthesia-related IHRs, a literature search was conducted using the key words allergy, basophil activation, CD63, CD203c, diagnosis, drugs, hypersensitivity, flow cytometry, MRGPRX2, specific IgE antibodies, leukotrienes, histamine, and tryptase; this was complemented by the authors' experience. The drugs and compounds that have predominantly been studied are neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), β-lactams, latex, and chlorhexidine. For sIgE NMBA, sensitivity and specificity varies between 38.5% to 92% and 92% to 100%, respectively. For sIgE β-lactams, sensitivity varies between 0% to 85% and specificity between 52% to 100%. sIgE to morphine should not be used in isolation to diagnose IHRs to NMBAs or opiates. sIgE for latex, and, in difficult cases, molecular diagnosis with quantification of sIgE to Hevea components constitute reliable diagnostics. For drugs, the sensitivity of BAT varies between 50% and 60% and specificity reaches 80% to 90%. Basophil mediator release tests seem to be abandoned and supplanted by BATs.

摘要

特异性 IgE(sIgE) 抗体的定量分析是记录与麻醉相关的即刻超敏反应 (IHR) 的重要手段。然而,目前可用的药物特异性检测方法较少,其预测价值尚不清楚。在非 IgE 介导的 IHR 中,细胞检测(如嗜碱性粒细胞介质释放试验和嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验 (BAT))可能有助于诊断。为了回顾 sIgE、介质释放和 BAT 在与麻醉相关的 IHR 中的定量分析的潜力和局限性,我们使用了过敏、嗜碱性粒细胞活化、CD63、CD203c、诊断、药物、超敏反应、流式细胞术、MRGPRX2、特异性 IgE 抗体、白三烯、组胺和类胰蛋白酶等关键词进行了文献检索,并结合了作者的经验。研究的主要药物和化合物是神经肌肉阻滞剂 (NMBAs)、β-内酰胺类、乳胶和洗必泰。对于 NMBA 的 sIgE,灵敏度和特异性分别在 38.5%至 92%和 92%至 100%之间。对于β-内酰胺类的 sIgE,灵敏度在 0%至 85%之间,特异性在 52%至 100%之间。不应单独使用吗啡 sIgE 来诊断 NMBA 或阿片类药物的 IHR。乳胶的 sIgE,以及在困难情况下用 Hevea 成分的 sIgE 进行分子诊断,构成了可靠的诊断方法。对于药物,BAT 的灵敏度在 50%至 60%之间,特异性达到 80%至 90%。嗜碱性粒细胞介质释放试验似乎已被放弃,被 BAT 取代。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验