Leysen J, Uyttebroek A, Sabato V, Bridts C H, De Clerck L S, Ebo D G
Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2014 Aug;44(8):1069-75. doi: 10.1111/cea.12344.
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are a predominant cause of perioperative anaphylaxis in Europe. Diagnosis of NMBA allergy relies upon the careful review of the anaesthetic report complemented with skin tests. Additional diagnostic tests are quantification of specific IgE antibodies (sIgE) and basophil activation test (BAT). However, data on the predictive value of the skin tests, the BAT and the sIgE assays (drug-specific and substituted ammonium structures) are limited or not available, mainly because such exploration requires dangerous NMBA provocation tests.
In this study, the predictive value of skin test, BAT and measurement of sIgE to substituted ammonium structures is gathered from a review of anaesthetic records of subsequent surgical procedures with NMBA administration and/or occurrence of perioperative incidents.
We investigated a series of 272 patients with perioperative anaphylaxis, of whom 100 had undergone second general anaesthesia. Negative skin test and negative BAT assisted the selection of alternative NMBA, which were well tolerated in all cases. Five patients with a positive sIgE to rocuronium but with negative skin testing and BAT safely received rocuronium during second anaesthesia. Twelve patients with sIgE reactivity to morphine, but negative skin test and BAT to benzylisoquinolines, tolerated administration of cisatracurium or atracurium. Alternatively, benzylisoquinoline allergy went undetected in the morphine solid-phase assay.
Skin test and BAT have an excellent negative predictive value in our series. The uneventful re-exposure of rocuronium in patients with an isolated positive sIgE result to rocuronium calls into question the predictive value of this assay and suggests sIgE serology to be less clinically predictive than the functional investigations relying upon activation of mast cells or basophils. The presence of a positive sIgE to substituted ammonium structures such as morphine does not preclude further use of benzylisoquinolines.
在欧洲,神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBAs)是围手术期过敏反应的主要原因。NMBA过敏的诊断依赖于对麻醉报告的仔细审查,并辅以皮肤试验。额外的诊断测试包括特异性IgE抗体(sIgE)定量和嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验(BAT)。然而,关于皮肤试验、BAT和sIgE测定(药物特异性和取代铵结构)的预测价值的数据有限或无法获得,主要是因为这种探索需要危险的NMBA激发试验。
在本研究中,通过回顾随后使用NMBA进行手术的麻醉记录和/或围手术期事件的发生情况,收集皮肤试验、BAT和sIgE对取代铵结构测量的预测价值。
我们调查了272例围手术期过敏反应患者,其中100例接受了第二次全身麻醉。皮肤试验阴性和BAT阴性有助于选择替代NMBA,所有病例均耐受性良好。5例对罗库溴铵sIgE阳性但皮肤试验和BAT阴性的患者在第二次麻醉期间安全接受了罗库溴铵。12例对吗啡有sIgE反应性但对苄基异喹啉皮肤试验和BAT阴性的患者耐受了顺式阿曲库铵或阿曲库铵的给药。另外,在吗啡固相试验中未检测到苄基异喹啉过敏。
在我们的系列研究中,皮肤试验和BAT具有出色的阴性预测价值。罗库溴铵sIgE结果单独阳性的患者再次使用罗库溴铵无不良事件,这对该测定的预测价值提出了质疑,并表明sIgE血清学在临床预测方面不如依赖肥大细胞或嗜碱性粒细胞活化的功能研究。对取代铵结构如吗啡的sIgE阳性并不排除进一步使用苄基异喹啉。