• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 ClinicalTrials.gov 中报告的 III 期随机对照抗生素治疗常见细菌感染临床试验和匹配的出版物。

Comparison of reporting phase III randomized controlled trials of antibiotic treatment for common bacterial infections in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.

机构信息

Medicine A, Rabin Medical Centre, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.

Medicine A, Rabin Medical Centre, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1211.e9-1211.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.010
PMID:29454846
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Discrepancies between ClinicalTrials.gov entries and matching publications were previously described in general medicine. We aimed to evaluate the consistency of reporting in trials addressing systemic antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for completed phase III trials comparing antibiotic regimens until May 2017. Matched publications were identified in PubMed. Two independent reviewers extracted data and identified inconsistencies. Reporting was assessed among studies started before and after 1 July 2005, when the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) required mandatory registration as a prerequisite for considering a trial for publication.

RESULTS

Matching publications were identified for 75 (70%) of 107 ClinicalTrials.gov entries. Median time from study completion to publication was 26 months (interquartile range 19-42). Primary outcome definition was inconsistent between ClinicalTrials.gov and publications in seven trials (7/72, 10%) and reporting of the primary outcome timeframe was inconsistent in 14 (14/71, 20%). Secondary outcomes definitions were inconsistent in 36 trials (36/66, 55%). Reporting of inclusion criteria and study timeline were inconsistent in 17% (13/65) and 3% (2/65), respectively. Trials started after July 2005 were significantly less likely to have reporting inconsistencies and were published in higher impact factor journals.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a lower inconsistency rate of outcome reporting compared with other medical disciplines. Reporting completeness and consistency were significantly better after July 2005. The ICMJE requirement for mandatory registration was associated with significant improvement in reporting quality in infectious diseases trials. Prolonged time lag to publication and missing data from unpublished trials should raise a discussion on current reporting and publishing procedures.

摘要

目的

此前在普通医学领域已描述过 ClinicalTrials.gov 条目与匹配出版物之间的差异。我们旨在评估针对全身抗生素治疗的试验报告的一致性。

方法

我们在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上搜索了截至 2017 年 5 月完成的比较抗生素方案的 III 期试验。在 PubMed 中确定了匹配的出版物。两名独立的审查员提取数据并识别出不一致之处。评估了 2005 年 7 月 1 日之前和之后开始的研究的报告,当时国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)要求强制性注册是考虑发表试验的前提。

结果

75 项(70%)ClinicalTrials.gov 条目匹配到了出版物。从研究完成到出版的中位数时间为 26 个月(四分位距 19-42)。7 项试验(7/72,10%)的主要结局定义在 ClinicalTrials.gov 和出版物之间不一致,14 项试验(14/71,20%)的主要结局时间框架报告不一致。36 项试验(36/66,55%)的次要结局定义不一致。纳入标准和研究时间线的报告分别在 17%(13/65)和 3%(2/65)的试验中不一致。2005 年 7 月以后开始的试验报告不一致的发生率明显较低,并且发表在影响因子较高的期刊上。

结论

我们发现与其他医学学科相比,结局报告的不一致率较低。2005 年 7 月以后,报告的完整性和一致性明显提高。ICMJE 强制性注册的要求与传染病试验报告质量的显著提高有关。从研究完成到发表的时间过长以及未发表试验中缺少数据,应就当前的报告和发表程序展开讨论。

相似文献

1
Comparison of reporting phase III randomized controlled trials of antibiotic treatment for common bacterial infections in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.比较 ClinicalTrials.gov 中报告的 III 期随机对照抗生素治疗常见细菌感染临床试验和匹配的出版物。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1211.e9-1211.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
2
Comparison of reporting phase I trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.比较 ClinicalTrials.gov 与匹配文献中 I 期临床试验结果的报告。
Invest New Drugs. 2017 Dec;35(6):827-833. doi: 10.1007/s10637-017-0510-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
3
Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.强制前瞻性试验注册能否防止未注册试验的发表和选择性结果报告?对五家强制要求进行前瞻性临床试验注册的精神病学杂志的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0133718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133718. eCollection 2015.
4
Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials.临床研究中的统计学争议:方案、公开的临床试验注册库和出版物中主要结局指标的比较:以肿瘤学试验为例。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):688-695. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw682.
5
Do Published Data in Trials Assessing Cancer Drugs Reflect the Real Picture of Efficacy and Safety?评估癌症药物的试验中发表的数据是否反映了疗效和安全性的真实情况?
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Nov;15(11):1363-1371. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.7002.
6
The fate of prospective spine studies registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov.在www.ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的前瞻性脊柱研究的命运。
Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
7
Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis.注册后临床试验的发布:一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
8
Characteristics of randomised trials on diseases in the digestive system registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: a retrospective analysis.ClinicalTrials.gov 注册的消化系统疾病随机临床试验特征:回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2011 Jan 1;1(2):e000309. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000309.
9
Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的评估某项干预措施的观察性研究结果的公开情况。
BMC Med. 2016 Jan 28;14:7. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0551-4.
10
Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting.比较公开可获取的出版物、注册处和 III 期试验方案,表明选择性结果报告仍存在。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Availability of results of clinical trials registered on EU Clinical Trials Register: cross sectional audit study.欧盟临床试验注册库中注册的临床试验结果的可获取性:横断面审计研究
BMJ Med. 2024 Jan 12;3(1):e000738. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000738. eCollection 2024.
2
Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses.评估研究注册与出版物之间差异的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 4;13(10):e076264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076264.
3
Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Tinnitus Trials: Comparison of Trial Registries With Corresponding Publications.
耳鸣试验中结果的选择性报告:试验注册信息与相应出版物的比较。
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 10;12:669501. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.669501. eCollection 2021.