• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: A review of the current literature.

作者信息

Bucknall Vittoria, Gibson Jn Alastair

机构信息

The Royal Infirmary and University of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499018758520. doi: 10.1177/2309499018758520.

DOI:10.1177/2309499018758520
PMID:29455630
Abstract

Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery (CESS) is now regularly performed in some centres in the Far East, yet rarely in Europe and the United States. This review describes the application of CESS through anterior and posterior approaches with analysis of the available evidence supporting current techniques. An electronic literature search identified 52 papers and proceedings' abstracts of which 25 (16 anterior approach and 9 posterior approach) provided comparable clinical outcomes. The results revealed a good or excellent outcome from CESS in 91% (range 74-100%) with a complication rate of 5%. In a local cohort study, patients had 72% less neck pain (visual analogue scale rating) and 81% less arm pain at 6 months when CESS was used as an isolated procedure, and 74% less neck pain and 83% less arm pain when coupled with disc replacement or fusion at an adjacent level.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cervical endoscopic spinal surgery: A review of the current literature.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499018758520. doi: 10.1177/2309499018758520.
2
Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.美国食品药品监督管理局器械临床试验豁免(IDE)前瞻性随机对照临床试验比较PCM颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的长期结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 15;40(10):674-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000869.
3
Adjacent-level arthroplasty following cervical fusion.颈椎融合术后相邻节段关节成形术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E5. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16412.
4
Anterior discectomy and fusion for the management of neck pain.前路椎间盘切除术及融合术治疗颈部疼痛。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Nov 1;24(21):2224-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199911010-00009.
5
Long-term clinical outcomes following 3- and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.三阶段和四阶段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后的长期临床结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):885-91. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15795. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
6
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)治疗两节段颈椎间盘退变疾病的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
7
Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.前瞻性随机研究颈椎关节成形术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术,长期随访:单中心 74 例患者的结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jan;18(1):36-42. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12555. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
8
A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).一项随机对照试验,比较了ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术(TDA)与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗单节段症状性颈椎间盘疾病(SCDD)的7年临床疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2263-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4431-6. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
9
Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.颈椎间盘置换与前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段症状性退行性椎间盘疾病的五年临床结果:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心研究性器械豁免临床试验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):213-24. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.SPINE15824. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
10
Osteocel Plus cellular allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes from a prospective multicenter study.Osteocel Plus 同种异体骨细胞移植物在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的应用:一项前瞻性多中心研究的临床和影像学结果评估
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 15;39(22):E1331-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000557.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Comparative Study of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) for Cervical Foraminal Pathology.经皮内镜颈椎减压术(PECD)与经皮椎弓根切开术、部分椎体切开术(PPPV)前路颈椎减压融合术治疗颈椎侧隐窝病变的临床与影像学疗效比较研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 29;59(7):1222. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071222.
2
Complications and Management of Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.脊柱内镜手术的并发症与处理
Neurospine. 2023 Mar;20(1):56-77. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346226.113. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
Comparative evaluation of posterior percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy using a 3.7 mm endoscope and a 6.9 mm endoscope for cervical disc herniation: a retrospective comparative cohort study.
比较 3.7mm 内镜与 6.9mm 内镜经皮后入路内窥镜下颈椎间盘切除术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的疗效:一项回顾性对比队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 2;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03980-9.
4
AOSpine Consensus Paper on Nomenclature for Working-Channel Endoscopic Spinal Procedures.AOSpine关于工作通道内镜脊柱手术命名法的共识文件。
Global Spine J. 2020 Apr;10(2 Suppl):111S-121S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219887364. Epub 2020 May 28.