Suppr超能文献

评估体外受精(IVF)妊娠常规产前检查期间超声估计孕周的准确性。

Assessing the accuracy of ultrasound estimation of gestational age during routine antenatal care in in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies.

作者信息

Knight Bridget, Brereton Aaron, Powell Roy J, Liversedge Helen

机构信息

NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter Medical School and RD&E NHS FT, Exeter, UK.

2Antenatal Ultrasound Department, Centre for Women's Health, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound. 2018 Feb;26(1):49-53. doi: 10.1177/1742271X17751257. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the UK an accurate gestational age is confirmed by ultrasound measured foetal crown rump length (CRL) at 11 + 2-14 + 1 weeks of gestation. The currently recommended Robinson and Fleming crown rump length reference chart was develop in 1975. Advances in ultrasound technology and standardized crown rump length measurement training could mean this is now out of date. Our study aimed to assess its accuracy in current routine antenatal care.

METHODS

Retrospective data from 178 IVF pregnancies seen for routine antenatal care at a UK Regional Maternity Unit between 1 January 2006 and 1 January 2016 was retrieved. We compared ultrasound calculated crown rump length gestational age taken at the routine First Trimester Screening Clinic (FTSC) with the 'true' gestational age calculated from the known IVF fertilization date.

RESULTS

We identified a systematic overestimation of gestational age by ultrasound using the currently recommended crown rump length reference chart when compared to IVF gestational age. The mean overestimation was 3.0 days (95% CI: 2.7 to 3.4),  < 0.001. A range of alternative ultrasound reference charts also generated a systematic overestimation, ranging from 1.6 to 2.9 days ( < 0.001, for each).

CONCLUSIONS

The current crown rump length reference chart systematically overestimates gestational age by an average of three days when assessed in IVF pregnancies. A systematic overestimation was also identified in alternative crown rump length reference charts. These differences, although slight, were systematic with implications for the accuracy of gestational age estimation particularly in pregnancies at risk of pre-term delivery or growth restriction. Our findings need confirming in larger, non IVF cohorts and could lead to the need for an updated crown rump length reference chart.

摘要

引言

在英国,通过超声测量孕11⁺²至14⁺¹周胎儿的头臀长度(CRL)来确定准确的孕周。目前推荐使用的罗宾逊和弗莱明头臀长度参考图表是1975年制定的。超声技术的进步以及标准化的头臀长度测量培训可能意味着该图表现在已经过时。我们的研究旨在评估其在当前常规产前护理中的准确性。

方法

检索了2006年1月1日至2016年1月1日期间在英国一家地区 maternity 单位接受常规产前护理的178例体外受精(IVF)妊娠的回顾性数据。我们将在常规孕早期筛查诊所(FTSC)通过超声计算得出的头臀长度孕周与根据已知的IVF受精日期计算出的“真实”孕周进行了比较。

结果

与IVF孕周相比,使用当前推荐的头臀长度参考图表时,我们发现超声对孕周存在系统性高估。平均高估为3.0天(95%置信区间:2.7至3.4),P<0.001。一系列其他超声参考图表也产生了系统性高估,范围从1.6至2.9天(每个P<0.001)。

结论

在IVF妊娠中评估时,当前的头臀长度参考图表系统性地高估孕周平均达三天。在其他头臀长度参考图表中也发现了系统性高估。这些差异虽然微小,但具有系统性,对孕周估计的准确性有影响,特别是对于有早产或生长受限风险的妊娠。我们的研究结果需要在更大的非IVF队列中得到证实,可能会导致需要更新头臀长度参考图表。

相似文献

8
Intertwin growth discordance throughout gestation and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.妊娠期间的生长不一致与妊娠高血压疾病。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun;228(6):730.e1-730.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.1290. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
10

本文引用的文献

10
Early ultrasound dating of pregnancy: selection and measurement biases.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 May;48(5):667-74. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00162-j.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验