Lu Hongye, He Lu, Zhao Yibing, Meng Huanxin
Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, China.
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 12;6:e4371. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4371. eCollection 2018.
Glycine air polishing has been proved to be safe, comfortable and time-saving. Whether it could substitute ultrasonic scaling to remove dental plaque biofilm during periodontal maintenance remains unclear. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of supragingival glycine air polishing (SGAP) on the subgingival periodontal pathogens during maintenance therapy and to check the association of periodontal pathogens and clinical parameters.
Twenty-three chronic periodontitis patients during their maintenance therapy were enrolled in the 12-week study. According to randomized split-mouth design, the test side was treated with SGAP (65 μm), while the control side was treated with supragingival ultrasonic scaling and polishing (SUSP) with rubber cup. Clinical examination including plaque index (PLI), probing depth (PD), bleeding index (BI) were performed at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Sampling of the subgingival plaque at each investigational site (mesiobuccal site of the mandibular first molar) was performed at baseline and 2, 4, 8, 12 weeks after maintenance treatment. Four periodontal pathogens including , and were detected by 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction.
Clinical status generally improved after treatment in both groups. PLI in both groups, PD in SGAP group and bleeding on probing (%) in SUSP group significantly decreased after treatment ( < 0.05). There was no significant difference of clinical parameters between two groups before and after treatment. The detection rates of , in both groups, in SUSP group and in SGAP group decreased after maintenance treatment in both groups, although no significant difference was found, and it rebound to baseline level at 12 weeks after maintenance treatment. There was no significant difference between SGAP group and SUSP group at any time point. -positive sites had significantly greater BI than -negative sites ( < 0.05).
Supragingival glycine air polishing had a reliable effect in removing subgingival dental plaque biofilm during maintenance period, and three months may be a proper maintenance interval for pockets not more than 5 mm.
已证实甘氨酸喷砂洁牙安全、舒适且省时。在牙周维护期,它能否替代超声龈上洁治去除牙菌斑生物膜尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估龈上甘氨酸喷砂洁牙(SGAP)在维护治疗期间对龈下牙周病原体的影响,并检查牙周病原体与临床参数之间的关联。
23名处于维护治疗期的慢性牙周炎患者参加了为期12周的研究。根据随机分组的左右半口设计,试验侧采用SGAP(65μm)治疗,对照侧采用超声龈上洁治和橡皮杯抛光(SUSP)。在基线和治疗后12周进行临床检查,包括菌斑指数(PLI)、探诊深度(PD)、出血指数(BI)。在基线以及维护治疗后2、4、8、12周,在每个研究部位(下颌第一磨牙的近中颊侧部位)采集龈下菌斑样本。通过16S rDNA聚合酶链反应检测四种牙周病原体,包括 、 和 。
两组治疗后临床状况总体均有改善。两组的PLI、SGAP组的PD以及SUSP组的探诊出血率(%)治疗后均显著降低(<0.05)。两组治疗前后临床参数无显著差异。两组中 、 的检出率,SUSP组中 的检出率以及SGAP组中 的检出率在维护治疗后均下降,尽管差异无统计学意义,且在维护治疗后12周反弹至基线水平。SGAP组和SUSP组在任何时间点均无显著差异。 阳性部位的BI显著高于 阴性部位(<0.05)。
龈上甘氨酸喷砂洁牙在维护期去除龈下牙菌斑生物膜方面具有可靠效果,对于深度不超过5mm的牙周袋,三个月可能是合适的维护间隔。