Overley Samuel C, Merrill Robert K, Baird Evan O, Meaike Joshua J, Cho Samuel K, Hecht Andrew C, Qureshi Sheeraz A
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Global Spine J. 2018 Feb;8(1):40-46. doi: 10.1177/2192568217697318. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
Prospective randomized control trial.
To investigate the role of cervical collars in postoperative care following 1- and 2-level instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
The Cervical Spine Research Society Resident Fellow Grant funded this project. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing 1- or 2-level ACDF surgery were randomized into groups receiving either no brace or a cervical brace for 6 weeks postoperatively. Neck Disability Index scores were recorded preoperatively and at regular follow-up visits up to 1 year. Computed tomography scans were read 1 year postoperatively to determine fusion rates, and subsidence was measured as change in middle vertebral distance between initial postoperative and 6-month follow-up lateral cervical radiographs.
Twenty-two patients were in the no-brace group, and 22 patients were in the brace group at final follow-up, with an average age of 50 and 55 years, respectively. The no-brace group had a total of 32 operative levels, whereas the brace group had 38 operative levels. There was no statistically significant difference in 1-year postoperative Neck Disability Index scores between the brace (9.30) and no-brace (6.95) groups ( = .28), in 6-month subsidence of all operative levels between the brace (0.85 mm) and no-brace (0.79 mm) groups ( = .72), or in the proportion of fused levels between the brace (89%) and no-brace (97%) groups ( = .37).
Our results suggest no advantage in wearing a cervical brace following 1- or 2-level ACDF surgery with respect to 1-year outcome scores, 1-year fusion rates, and 6-month subsidence.
前瞻性随机对照试验。
探讨颈托在单节段和双节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)术后护理中的作用。
本项目由颈椎研究协会住院医师奖学金资助。连续50例接受单节段或双节段ACDF手术的患者被随机分为术后不使用支具组和使用颈托6周组。术前及术后定期随访直至1年,记录颈部残疾指数评分。术后1年读取计算机断层扫描结果以确定融合率,并通过术后初期与术后6个月颈椎侧位X线片测量椎体中间距离的变化来测量下沉情况。
最终随访时,无支具组有22例患者,支具组有22例患者,平均年龄分别为50岁和55岁。无支具组共有32个手术节段,而支具组有38个手术节段。支具组(9.30)和无支具组(6.95)术后1年的颈部残疾指数评分无统计学显著差异(P = 0.28),支具组(0.85 mm)和无支具组(0.79 mm)所有手术节段术后6个月的下沉情况无统计学显著差异(P = 0.72),支具组(89%)和无支具组(97%)的融合节段比例无统计学显著差异(P = 0.37)。
我们的结果表明,在单节段或双节段ACDF手术后佩戴颈托在1年结局评分、1年融合率和6个月下沉方面没有优势。