• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach versus conventional L-shaped lateral approach in treating calcaneal fractures: a Meta-analysis].

作者信息

Wu Min-Hao, Sun Wen-Chao, Yan Fei-Fei, Hou Zhi-Qiang, Feng Fan, Cai Lin

机构信息

The 4th Department of Orthopaedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, China.

The 4th Department of Orthopaedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, China;

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Dec 25;30(12):1118-1126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.12.009.

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.12.009
PMID:29457434
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy and safety of minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach versus conventional L-shaped lateral approach in treating calcaneal fractures.

METHODS

The studies concerning about randomized controlled trial and non-randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach versus conventional L-shaped lateral approach in treating calcaneal fractures from the time of creating database to March, 2017 were searched from PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMbase, ISI Web of Knowledge databases, VIP, CNKI, CBM and Wan Fang. The literatures which screened by randomized controlled trial and non- randomized controlled trial were extracted and performed quality assessment by two people. Meta analysis were performed by RevMan 5.3 software and GRADE system were used to evaluate quality.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trial and 4 non-randomized controlled trial were included, totally 493 patients. Meta-analysis results showed compared with conventional L-shaped lateral approach, minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach had shorter operative time [MD=-5.41, 95%CI(-6.71, -4.12), <0.000 01], lower incidence of postoperative complications[OR=0.10, 95%CI(0.05, 0.21), <0.000 01], and higher AOFAS score [MD=-3.09, 95%CI(-1.72, 4.46), <0.000 01] at the final follow-up. Böhler angle in conventional L-shaped lateral approach was better than that of minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach [MD=-0.80, 95%CI(-1.45, -0.14), <0.05]. While there were no significant differences in postoperative Gissanes angle [MD=0.35, 95%CI(-0.77, 1.47), >0.05] and Maryland score[MD=2.12, 95%CI(-0.71, 4.95), >0.05] between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach and conventional L-shaped lateral approach has similar clinical effect for the treatment of calcaneal fractures. However, minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach has advantages of shorter operation time, lower incidence of complication and better safety. For the limited quantity of the original studies, operative approach should be chosen according to the patient.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Minimally invasive sinus tarsal approach versus conventional L-shaped lateral approach in treating calcaneal fractures: a Meta-analysis].
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Dec 25;30(12):1118-1126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.12.009.
2
[Clinical study of sinus tarsal approach combined with Herbert screw and minimally invasive calcaneal locking plate in the treatment of SandersⅡ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures].距下窦入路联合Herbert螺钉与微创跟骨锁定钢板治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 Nov 25;35(11):1026-30. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.11.004.
3
Open reduction and internal fixation with conventional plate via L-shaped lateral approach versus internal fixation with percutaneous plate via a sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures - a randomized controlled trial.经外侧 L 形入路常规钢板切开复位内固定与经跗骨窦入路微创钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折的随机对照研究
Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
4
Comparison of the Curative Effect of Percutaneous Reduction with Plastic Calcaneal Forceps Combined with Medial External Fixation in the Treatment of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures.经皮复位塑料跟骨夹联合内侧外固定治疗关节内跟骨骨折的疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec;13(8):2344-2354. doi: 10.1111/os.13118. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
5
Minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis versus ORIF for Sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized intervention trial.微创经皮接骨术与切开复位内固定术治疗Sanders II型和III型跟骨骨折的前瞻性随机干预试验
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0511-5.
6
Efficacy of Sinus Tarsal Approach Compared With Conventional L-Shaped Lateral Approach in the Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.跗骨窦入路与传统L形外侧入路治疗跟骨骨折的疗效比较:一项Meta分析
Front Surg. 2021 Jan 15;7:602053. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.602053. eCollection 2020.
7
[Effectiveness analysis of modified tarsal sinus approach for Sanders - type calcaneal fractures].改良跗骨窦入路治疗Sanders型跟骨骨折的疗效分析
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 15;33(4):462-466. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201810010.
8
[Minimally invasive tarsal sinus incision combined with manipulative reduction and internal fixation for calcaneal fractures of Sanders typeⅡ and Ⅲ].微创跗骨窦切口联合手法复位及内固定治疗SandersⅡ型和Ⅲ型跟骨骨折
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):220-223. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.03.011.
9
Comparison of percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and calcium sulfate cement grafting versus minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach and plate fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial.经皮空心螺钉固定联合硫酸钙骨水泥植骨与微创距下关节入路钢板固定治疗移位型跟骨关节内骨折的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 15;17:288. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1122-8.
10
Minimally invasive technique versus an extensile lateral approach for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.微创技术与广泛外侧入路治疗关节内跟骨骨折。
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jun;34(6):773-80. doi: 10.1177/1071100713477607. Epub 2013 Mar 4.