Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Seven Derivations to Prioritize Liver Transplant Candidates: Which Is the Winner?

OBJECTIVES

Under the present liver transplant policy, patients with the highest risk of death receive preference for organ placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and seven prognostic derivatives of this test for outcome prediction in cirrhotic patients on liver transplant wait lists.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 416 patients (65.9% male; age 49 ± 13.9 years) who were entered to liver transplant wait lists from January 2013 to October 2016. Study endpoints were 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

All prognostic models had acceptable overall performances (0.12 < Brier score < 0.21). The MELD-to-serum sodium ratio test outperformed its counterparts at all 3 endpoints. Estimated C statistics ranged from 0.77 to 0.83. The largest value at 3 months was for the 5-variable MELD score (0.83), and the largest value at 6 months (0.82) and 1 year (0.83) was for the MELD-albumin score. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and calibration plots revealed underestimation for the entire range of predicted risk (P < .001). With decision curve analysis, the MELD-to-serum sodium ratio and United Kingdom Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scoring tests covered the most extensive range of optimal threshold probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some derivations, including sodium and albumin, showed effective prioritization of liver transplant candidates, poor calibration statistics highlighted the need for a recalibration process as an inevitable prerequisite before daily clinical use of these tests at the individual level.