• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CD34 细胞参与的单个核细胞治疗对无选择重症肢体缺血的疗效:随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析。

Therapeutic efficacy of CD34 cell-involved mononuclear cell therapy for no-option critical limb ischemia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

机构信息

1 Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

2 Department of Hematology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Vasc Med. 2018 Jun;23(3):219-231. doi: 10.1177/1358863X17752556. Epub 2018 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1177/1358863X17752556
PMID:29457540
Abstract

Early-phase clinical trials in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) have shown positive results of mononuclear cell therapy. The current meta-analysis investigated whether cluster of differentiation (CD) 34 mononuclear cell therapy (CD34MCT) is effective for no-option CLI. Ten randomized controlled clinical studies of CD34MCT for no-option CLI with 479 patients were identified and analyzed for pooled results. Compared to control groups, the CD34MCT was associated with lower total amputation (odds ratio (OR): 0.45, p=0.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-0.85) and a higher complete ulcer healing rate (OR: 2.80, p=0.008; 95% CI: 1.31-6.02), but showed no advantage in major amputation (OR: 0.58, p=0.11; 95% CI: 0.29-1.14) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.82, p=0.62; 95% CI: 0.36-1.83) . Studies with a high CD34 cell dosage showed significant results in major amputation (OR: 0.38, p=0.002; 95% CI: 0.21-0.70), total amputation (OR: 0.31, p=0.0002; 95% CI: 0.17-0.57) and complete ulcer healing (OR: 7.58, p=0.0005; 95% CI: 2.40-23.88), which were not observed in the low-dose studies. However, inclusion of placebo-controlled studies showed no improvement of the CD34MCT in total amputation (OR: 0.67, p=0.42; 95% CI: 0.25-1.79), major amputation (OR: 1.31, p=0.43; 95% CI: 0.67-2.54) or complete ulcer healing (OR: 1.52, p=0.27; 95% CI: 0.72-3.21), which were extremely significant in non-placebo-controlled studies ( p<0.001). In conclusion, the significant results of CD34MCT might not support its therapeutic benefit due to high placebo-effect risk and considerable heterogeneity caused by distinct cell doses. More sizable double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with higher CD34 cell dosage are needed in the future.

摘要

早期临床试验表明,单核细胞治疗对严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者有积极效果。目前的荟萃分析研究了 CD34 单核细胞治疗(CD34MCT)是否对无选择 CLI 有效。纳入了 10 项 CD34MCT 治疗无选择 CLI 的随机对照临床试验,共纳入 479 例患者进行汇总分析。与对照组相比,CD34MCT 治疗与较低的总截肢率(比值比(OR):0.45,p=0.01;95%置信区间(CI):0.24-0.85)和较高的完全溃疡愈合率(OR:2.80,p=0.008;95%CI:1.31-6.02)相关,但在主要截肢(OR:0.58,p=0.11;95%CI:0.29-1.14)和全因死亡率(OR:0.82,p=0.62;95%CI:0.36-1.83)方面没有优势。高 CD34 细胞剂量的研究在主要截肢(OR:0.38,p=0.002;95%CI:0.21-0.70)、总截肢(OR:0.31,p=0.0002;95%CI:0.17-0.57)和完全溃疡愈合(OR:7.58,p=0.0005;95%CI:2.40-23.88)方面有显著结果,而低剂量研究中未观察到这些结果。然而,纳入安慰剂对照研究后,CD34MCT 在总截肢(OR:0.67,p=0.42;95%CI:0.25-1.79)、主要截肢(OR:1.31,p=0.43;95%CI:0.67-2.54)或完全溃疡愈合(OR:1.52,p=0.27;95%CI:0.72-3.21)方面无改善,而非安慰剂对照研究中差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。总之,由于高安慰剂效应风险和不同细胞剂量引起的高度异质性,CD34MCT 的显著结果可能无法支持其治疗益处。未来需要进行更大规模的、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,并使用更高剂量的 CD34 细胞。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic efficacy of CD34 cell-involved mononuclear cell therapy for no-option critical limb ischemia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.CD34 细胞参与的单个核细胞治疗对无选择重症肢体缺血的疗效:随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
Vasc Med. 2018 Jun;23(3):219-231. doi: 10.1177/1358863X17752556. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
2
Autologous cells derived from different sources and administered using different regimens for 'no-option' critical lower limb ischaemia patients.来自不同来源的自体细胞,针对“无其他选择”的严重下肢缺血患者,采用不同方案进行给药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 29;8(8):CD010747. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010747.pub2.
3
Characteristics of responders to autologous bone marrow cell therapy for no-option critical limb ischemia.自体骨髓细胞疗法治疗无选择的严重肢体缺血患者的反应特征。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016 Aug 17;7(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0379-z.
4
A randomized, controlled pilot study of autologous CD34+ cell therapy for critical limb ischemia.自体 CD34+ 细胞治疗严重肢体缺血的随机对照初步研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec;5(6):821-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968321. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
5
Safety and efficacy of cell-based therapy on critical limb ischemia: A meta-analysis.基于细胞的疗法治疗严重肢体缺血的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Cytotherapy. 2016 Jun;18(6):712-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
6
Bone Marrow derived Cell Therapy in Critical Limb Ischemia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo Controlled Trials.骨髓源性细胞疗法治疗严重肢体缺血:随机安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;50(6):775-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.08.018. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
7
Cell Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.用于严重肢体缺血的细胞疗法:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Angiology. 2016 May;67(5):444-55. doi: 10.1177/0003319715595172. Epub 2015 Jul 19.
8
Purified CD34 cells versus peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the treatment of angiitis-induced no-option critical limb ischaemia: 12-Month results of a prospective randomised single-blinded non-inferiority trial.纯化的 CD34 细胞与外周血单个核细胞治疗血管炎诱导的无选择关键肢体缺血:一项前瞻性随机单盲非劣效性试验的 12 个月结果。
EBioMedicine. 2018 Sep;35:46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
9
Literature review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of cilostazol on limb salvage rates after infrainguinal endovascular and open revascularization.下肢动脉腔内和开放血运重建术后西洛他唑对肢体挽救率疗效的文献回顾和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):711-721.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.125. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
10
Interim analysis results from the RESTORE-CLI, a randomized, double-blind multicenter phase II trial comparing expanded autologous bone marrow-derived tissue repair cells and placebo in patients with critical limb ischemia.RESTORE-CLI 是一项随机、双盲、多中心的 II 期临床试验的中期分析结果,该试验比较了扩展的自体骨髓源性组织修复细胞与安慰剂在严重肢体缺血患者中的疗效。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):1032-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Preconditioning With TGF-β Inhibitors Enhances Therapeutic Efficacy of Endothelial Progenitor Cells for Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice.用转化生长因子-β抑制剂预处理可增强内皮祖细胞对糖尿病小鼠伤口愈合的治疗效果。
MedComm (2020). 2025 Sep 1;6(9):e70364. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70364. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
The Immune-Centric Revolution Translated into Clinical Application: Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell (PBMNC) Therapy in Diabetic Patients with No-Option Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia (NO-CLTI)-Rationale and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.以免疫为中心的革命转化为临床应用:外周血单个核细胞(PBMNC)疗法用于无可选择的严重肢体威胁性缺血(NO-CLTI)糖尿病患者——观察性研究的原理及荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 28;13(23):7230. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237230.
3
Advances for the treatment of lower extremity arterial disease associated with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病相关下肢动脉疾病的治疗进展
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Aug 17;9:929718. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.929718. eCollection 2022.
4
PBMNCs Treatment in Critical Limb Ischemia and Candidate Biomarkers of Efficacy.外周血单个核细胞治疗严重肢体缺血及疗效候选生物标志物
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 4;12(5):1137. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051137.
5
Human bone marrow-derived, pooled, allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells manufactured from multiple donors at different times show comparable biological functions in vitro, and in vivo to repair limb ischemia.人骨髓来源的、汇集的、异基因间充质基质细胞由不同时间的多个供体制造,在体外和体内具有相似的生物学功能,可修复肢体缺血。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021 May 10;12(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02330-9.
6
Therapeutic Biomaterial Approaches to Alleviate Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.缓解慢性肢体威胁性缺血的治疗性生物材料方法
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021 Feb 8;8(7):2003119. doi: 10.1002/advs.202003119. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Cell Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: Advantages, Limitations, and New Perspectives for Treatment of Patients with Critical Diabetic Vasculopathy.细胞疗法治疗严重肢体缺血:治疗严重糖尿病血管病变患者的优势、局限性和新视角。
Curr Diab Rep. 2021 Mar 2;21(3):11. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01378-4.
8
Autologous Bone-Marrow vs. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Therapy for Peripheral Artery Disease in Diabetic Patients.自体骨髓与外周血单个核细胞治疗糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病的比较
Int J Stem Cells. 2021 Feb 28;14(1):21-32. doi: 10.15283/ijsc20088.
9
Current Status of Cell-Based Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia.细胞治疗在重症肢体缺血患者中的现状。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Nov 26;21(23):8999. doi: 10.3390/ijms21238999.
10
Predictors of responders to mononuclear stem cell-based therapeutic angiogenesis for no-option critical limb ischemia.预测单核细胞干细胞为无选择关键肢体缺血患者的治疗性血管生成的反应者。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019 Jan 11;10(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-1117-5.