Suppr超能文献

根据国际额窦解剖分类的额窦细胞患病率的计算机断层分析。

Computed tomography analysis of frontal cell prevalence according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Jul;8(7):825-830. doi: 10.1002/alr.22105. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) is an international consensus document published in 2016 to standardize the nomenclature of cells in the region of the frontal recess and frontal sinus. The IFAC was designed to be surgically relevant and anatomically precise. The current study was undertaken to assess the prevalence of the frontal cell variants as defined by the IFAC, as well as to determine the interrater reliability of the IFAC.

METHODS

Three independent reviewers examined triplanar nondiseased maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scans to assess the anatomy of the frontal recess according to the IFAC system. The prevalence of each cell type was assessed and interrater reliability was measured using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

One hundred CT scans (200 sides) were examined. Of the 200 sides, 96.5% contained an agger nasi cell (ICC, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.86), 30.0% contained a supra agger cell (ICC, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92), 20.0% contained a supra agger frontal cell (ICC 0.80; 95% CI 0.74-0.84), 72.0% contained a supra bulla cell (ICC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.85), 5.5% contained a supra bulla frontal cell (ICC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.77), 28.5% contained a supraorbital ethmoid cell (ICC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83), and 30.0% contained a frontal septal cell (ICC, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84). The ICC was good to excellent for identification of all frontal cell types.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes the normative distribution of frontal recess cells in a nondiseased population according to IFAC and demonstrates favorable interrater reliability of the classification system.

摘要

背景

国际额窦解剖分类(IFAC)是 2016 年发表的一份国际共识文件,旨在规范额窦筛区和额窦细胞的命名。IFAC 的设计具有手术相关性和解剖精确性。本研究旨在评估 IFAC 定义的额窦细胞变体的流行率,并确定 IFAC 的组内信度。

方法

三位独立的评审员使用三面额面计算机断层扫描(CT)评估额窦筛区的解剖结构,根据 IFAC 系统进行评估。评估每种细胞类型的患病率,并使用组内相关系数(ICC)测量组内信度。

结果

共检查了 100 例 CT 扫描(200 侧)。在这 200 侧中,96.5%含有额隐窝细胞(ICC,0.82;95%置信区间[CI],0.77-0.86),30.0%含有前筛突细胞(ICC,0.89;95% CI,0.86-0.92),20.0%含有前筛额窦细胞(ICC,0.80;95% CI,0.74-0.84),72.0%含有眶下气房细胞(ICC,0.81;95% CI,0.76-0.85),5.5%含有眶下气房额窦细胞(ICC,0.71;95% CI,0.63-0.77),28.5%含有眶上筛骨细胞(ICC,0.78;95% CI,0.72-0.83),30.0%含有额隔细胞(ICC,0.80;95% CI,0.74-0.84)。对于所有额窦细胞类型的识别,ICC 均为良好至优秀。

结论

本研究根据 IFAC 描述了非病变人群中额窦筛区细胞的正常分布,并证明了分类系统具有良好的组内信度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验