Jaremek-Ochniak Weronika, Sierdziński Janusz, Popko-Zagor Mariola
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Czerniakowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Medical Informatics and Telemedicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Otolaryngol Pol. 2022 Jan 14;76(2):7-14. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.6959.
<br><b>Introduction:</b>The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) is a consensus document created to standardize and specify the naming of cells within the region of the frontal recess and frontal sinus.</br> <br><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to analyze the difficulties in identifying cells according to the IFAC in patients with diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis.</br> <br><b>Material and methods:</b> Three independent reviewers examined triplanar computed tomography (CT) scans to assess the anatomy of the frontal recess using the IFAC system. CT scans were chosen randomly and divided into 3 groups: CT scans of patients not presenting sinus complaints (control group), CT scans of patients affected by diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis non-type 2, and CT scans of patients affected by diffuse primary chronic rhinosinusitis type 2.</br> <br><b>Results:</b> Identification of all frontal cell types was accurate in patients not presenting sinus complaints (P-value < 0.05). Patients scoring 9 or more points in the Lund-Mackay scoring system demonstrated a statistically increased risk of improper identification of frontal recess cells (P-value < 0.0001).</br> <br><b>Conclusions:</b> Due to a large number of possible anatomical variants and changes caused by the chronic inflammatory disease, the IFAC nomenclatura is easier to apply to non-type 2 primary diffuse CRS patients with low scores in the L-M score scale than to primary diffuse type 2 CRS patients with higher M-L scores.</br>.
引言:国际额窦解剖分类(IFAC)是一份共识文件,旨在规范和明确额隐窝及额窦区域内细胞的命名。
目的:本研究旨在分析弥漫性原发性慢性鼻窦炎患者根据IFAC识别细胞的困难程度。
材料与方法:三名独立的评估者使用IFAC系统检查三平面计算机断层扫描(CT),以评估额隐窝的解剖结构。随机选择CT扫描并分为3组:无鼻窦症状患者的CT扫描(对照组)、非2型弥漫性原发性慢性鼻窦炎患者的CT扫描以及2型弥漫性原发性慢性鼻窦炎患者的CT扫描。
结果:无鼻窦症状患者对所有额窦细胞类型的识别均准确(P值<0.05)。在Lund-Mackay评分系统中得分为9分或更高的患者,额隐窝细胞识别错误的风险在统计学上显著增加(P值<0.0001)。
结论:由于存在大量可能的解剖变异以及慢性炎症疾病引起的变化,与L-M评分较高的原发性2型弥漫性CRS患者相比,IFAC命名法更易于应用于L-M评分较低的非2型原发性弥漫性CRS患者。