Suppr超能文献

诊断眼眶可扩张性静脉畸形的弥散加权磁共振成像。

Diagnosing Distensible Venous Malformations of the Orbit With Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 May;189:146-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the diffusion-weighted imaging of nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations of the orbit with that of other histologically-proven orbital tumors.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

Patients with nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations of the orbit and patients with other histologically-proven orbital tumors were selected for chart review. The main outcome measure was the apparent diffusion coefficient of these lesions.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients qualified for chart review; 9 patients had nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations and 58 patients had other histologically-proven tumors. Three of the 9 patients with nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations were initially misdiagnosed as having had solid orbital tumors. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient of distensible venous malformations was 2.80 ± 0.48 × 10 mm/s, whereas the mean apparent diffusion coefficient of other histologically-proven tumors was 1.18 ± 0.39 × 10 mm/s (P < .001). The mean apparent diffusion coefficient ranged from 2.42 to 3.94 × 10 mm/s in the distensible venous malformation group, whereas other histologically-proven tumors ranged from 0.53 to 2.08 × 10 mm/s. Therefore, in this single-institution series, a threshold value of 2.10 × 10 mm/s was 100% sensitive and 100% specific for distensible venous malformations.

CONCLUSION

Certain nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations can evade diagnostic suspicion and mimic solid orbital tumors on standard magnetic resonance imaging sequences. In this single-institution series, diffusion-weighted imaging effectively distinguished these nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations from other orbital tumors.

摘要

目的

比较非血栓性可扩张性眼眶静脉畸形与其他经组织学证实的眼眶肿瘤的弥散加权成像。

设计

回顾性病例对照研究。

方法

选择非血栓性可扩张性眼眶静脉畸形和其他经组织学证实的眼眶肿瘤患者进行图表回顾。主要观察指标是这些病变的表观扩散系数。

结果

67 例患者符合图表审查条件;9 例患者患有非血栓性可扩张性静脉畸形,58 例患者患有其他经组织学证实的肿瘤。9 例非血栓性可扩张性静脉畸形中有 3 例最初被误诊为实性眶肿瘤。可扩张性静脉畸形的平均表观扩散系数为 2.80 ± 0.48×10mm/s,而其他经组织学证实的肿瘤的平均表观扩散系数为 1.18 ± 0.39×10mm/s(P<0.001)。在可扩张性静脉畸形组中,平均表观扩散系数范围为 2.42 至 3.94×10mm/s,而其他经组织学证实的肿瘤范围为 0.53 至 2.08×10mm/s。因此,在本单机构系列中,阈值为 2.10×10mm/s 时,对可扩张性静脉畸形的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 100%。

结论

某些非血栓性可扩张性静脉畸形可能会逃避诊断怀疑,并在标准磁共振成像序列上模拟实性眼眶肿瘤。在本单机构系列中,弥散加权成像有效地将这些非血栓性可扩张性静脉畸形与其他眼眶肿瘤区分开来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验