Rosenbaum P L, Armstrong R W, King S M
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1986 Oct;7(5):302-7. doi: 10.1097/00004703-198610000-00005.
Social interaction between able-bodied and disabled children (as in a "buddy" program) is known to improve children's attitudes toward handicapped peers. This randomized-factorial-design study evaluated the relative impact of two interventions--a buddy program and the Kids-on-the-Block (KOB) puppet program--singly and in combination. Outcomes included measures of attitudes, familiarity with disabled schoolmates, self-esteem, and parental attitude. The buddy program appeared to be a successful intervention. The KOB program alone had no measurable impact on any outcomes, compared with control children. Surprisingly, the combination of KOB and buddy programs produced a significantly smaller impact than the buddy program alone. The combination was also marginally significantly poorer than the change experienced by the control group. These results are discussed in relation to the probable dissonance between real disabled children and the puppets. Suggestions are advanced for possible strategies to enhance interventions to teach social interactional skills to able-bodied children.
健全儿童与残疾儿童之间的社交互动(如在“伙伴”计划中)已知能改善儿童对残疾同伴的态度。这项随机因子设计研究评估了两种干预措施——伙伴计划和“街区儿童”(KOB)木偶计划——单独及联合实施时的相对影响。结果包括态度测量、对残疾同学的熟悉程度、自尊以及家长态度。伙伴计划似乎是一种成功的干预措施。与对照组儿童相比,单独的KOB计划对任何结果均无显著影响。令人惊讶的是,KOB计划与伙伴计划相结合产生的影响明显小于单独的伙伴计划。这种组合在改善程度上也略显著低于对照组的变化。结合真实残疾儿童与木偶之间可能存在的不一致对这些结果进行了讨论。针对如何增强干预措施以向健全儿童传授社交互动技能提出了可行策略建议。