Shensa Ariel, Sidani Jaime E, Dew Mary Amanda, Escobar-Viera César G, Primack Brian A
Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Am J Health Behav. 2018 Mar 1;42(2):116-128. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.42.2.11.
Individuals use social media with varying quantity, emotional, and behavioral at- tachment that may have differential associations with mental health outcomes. In this study, we sought to identify distinct patterns of social media use (SMU) and to assess associations between those patterns and depression and anxiety symptoms.
In October 2014, a nationally-representative sample of 1730 US adults ages 19 to 32 completed an online survey. Cluster analysis was used to identify patterns of SMU. Depression and anxiety were measured using respective 4-item Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scales. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between clus- ter membership and depression and anxiety.
Cluster analysis yielded a 5-cluster solu- tion. Participants were characterized as "Wired," "Connected," "Diffuse Dabblers," "Concentrated Dabblers," and "Unplugged." Membership in 2 clusters - "Wired" and "Connected" - increased the odds of elevated depression and anxiety symptoms (AOR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.5-4.7; AOR = 3.7, 95% CI = 2.1-6.5, respectively, and AOR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.3-3.2; AOR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.3-3.1, respectively).
SMU pattern characterization of a large population suggests 2 pat- terns are associated with risk for depression and anxiety. Developing educational interventions that address use patterns rather than single aspects of SMU (eg, quantity) would likely be useful.
个体使用社交媒体的数量、情感和行为依恋程度各不相同,这可能与心理健康结果存在不同的关联。在本研究中,我们试图识别社交媒体使用(SMU)的不同模式,并评估这些模式与抑郁和焦虑症状之间的关联。
2014年10月,一个由1730名年龄在19至32岁之间的美国成年人组成的全国代表性样本完成了一项在线调查。聚类分析用于识别SMU模式。使用各自的4项患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)量表测量抑郁和焦虑。多变量逻辑回归模型用于评估聚类成员与抑郁和焦虑之间的关联。
聚类分析得出了一个5聚类解决方案。参与者被分为“网络成瘾者”“社交达人”“散漫涉猎者”“专注涉猎者”和“非网络使用者”。属于“网络成瘾者”和“社交达人”这两个聚类增加了抑郁和焦虑症状加重的几率(调整后的比值比分别为2.7,95%置信区间为1.5 - 4.7;3.7,95%置信区间为2.1 - 6.5,以及2.0,95%置信区间为1.3 - 3.2;2.0,95%置信区间为1.3 - 3.1)。
对大量人群的SMU模式特征分析表明,有两种模式与抑郁和焦虑风险相关。开发针对使用模式而非SMU单一方面(如使用量)的教育干预措施可能会很有用。