• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于血培养的直接快速抗生素敏感性试验(dRAST)及其在临床实践中的潜在用途。

Direct rapid antibiotic susceptibility test (dRAST) for blood culture and its potential usefulness in clinical practice.

作者信息

Kim Jeong-Han, Kim Taek Soo, Song Sang Hoon, Choi Jungil, Han Sangkwon, Kim Dong Young, Kwon Sunghoon, Lee Eunyoung, Song Kyoung-Ho, Choe Pyeong Gyun, Bang Ji Hwan, Kim Eu Suk, Park Sang Won, Kim Hong Bin, Kim Nam Joong, Park Wan Beom, Oh Myoung-Don

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 2018 Mar;67(3):325-331. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000678. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.000678
PMID:29458541
Abstract

PURPOSE

The direct rapid antibiotic susceptibility test (dRAST), based on analysing changes in bacterial micro-colonies under antibiotic conditions, detects antibiotic resistance within 6 h of direct smear examination results. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of dRAST and evaluate its potential usefulness for improving selection of appropriate antibiotic in real clinical practice settings.

METHODOLOGY

We evaluated the accuracy of dRAST by comparing the antibiotic treatments that should have been administered based on dRAST results and the broth microdilution (BMD) test and its potential usefulness via simulation.

RESULT

For 49/52 (94.2 %) patients with Gram-positive bacteraemia and 66/67 (98.5 %) patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia, antibiotics indicated by dRAST results were the same as those indicated by the BMD test. Among 34 patients with ineffective and suboptimal treatment, 19 (55.9 %) of patients could have received optimal treatment 1 to 2 days earlier with dRAST results. Among 33 patients given unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics, 1 to 2 days earlier de-escalation could have been possible for 27 (81.8 %) patients based on dRAST results.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of dRAST could increase the use of optimal antibiotics and reduce unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use in the early period of bacteraemia.

摘要

目的

直接快速抗生素敏感性试验(dRAST)基于分析抗生素作用下细菌微菌落的变化,能在直接涂片检查结果得出后6小时内检测出抗生素耐药性。本研究旨在评估dRAST的准确性,并评估其在实际临床实践中对改善合适抗生素选择的潜在效用。

方法

我们通过比较基于dRAST结果应给予的抗生素治疗与肉汤微量稀释(BMD)试验,并通过模拟评估其潜在效用,来评估dRAST的准确性。

结果

对于49/52(94.2%)例革兰氏阳性菌血症患者和66/67(98.5%)例革兰氏阴性菌血症患者,dRAST结果指示的抗生素与BMD试验指示的相同。在34例治疗无效和欠佳的患者中,19例(55.9%)患者若根据dRAST结果本可在1至2天前接受最佳治疗。在33例使用了不必要的广谱抗生素的患者中,根据dRAST结果,27例(81.8%)患者本可在1至2天前实现降阶梯治疗。

结论

引入dRAST可增加最佳抗生素的使用,并减少菌血症早期不必要的广谱抗生素使用。

相似文献

1
Direct rapid antibiotic susceptibility test (dRAST) for blood culture and its potential usefulness in clinical practice.用于血培养的直接快速抗生素敏感性试验(dRAST)及其在临床实践中的潜在用途。
J Med Microbiol. 2018 Mar;67(3):325-331. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000678. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
Prospective evaluation of a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (QMAC-dRAST) for selecting optimal targeted antibiotics in positive blood culture.前瞻性评估快速抗菌药敏试验(QMAC-dRAST)在阳性血培养中选择最佳靶向抗生素的效果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Aug 1;74(8):2255-2260. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz168.
3
Evaluation of Quantamatrix dRAST system for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates from positive blood cultures, in comparison with commercial Micronaut broth microdilution system.评价 Quantamatrix dRAST 系统与商用 Micronaut 肉汤微量稀释法系统比较,用于快速检测阳性血培养物中的细菌分离物的抗菌药物敏感性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Sep;110(1):116436. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116436. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
4
Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates.评价 QMAC-dRAST 系统版本 2.5 对阳性血培养肉汤和分离培养菌落的革兰氏阴性菌进行快速抗菌药物敏感性测试的效果。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2024 May;38(9):e25043. doi: 10.1002/jcla.25043. Epub 2024 May 28.
5
A comparative study of a rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing system directly from positive blood cultures to the disk diffusion and VITEK 2 methods.一种直接从阳性血培养物到纸片扩散法和 VITEK 2 方法进行快速表型抗菌药物敏感性检测系统的比较研究。
J Microbiol Methods. 2024 Nov;226:107046. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2024.107046. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
6
A Direct Rapid Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Enables Early Selection of Optimal Antibiotics to Treat Bacteremia in COVID-19 Patients.直接快速表型抗菌药物敏感性试验有助于早期选择最佳抗生素治疗新冠肺炎患者的菌血症。
Infect Chemother. 2021 Dec;53(4):776-785. doi: 10.3947/ic.2021.0139.
7
Direct, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test from positive blood cultures based on microscopic imaging analysis.基于显微镜成像分析的阳性血培养物直接快速抗菌药物敏感性检测。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 25;7(1):1148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01278-2.
8
Performance of dRAST on Prospective Clinical Blood Culture Samples in a Simulated Clinical Setting and on Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.dRAST 在模拟临床环境中的前瞻性临床血培养样本和多药耐药菌中的性能。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0210721. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02107-21. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
Comparative evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST V2.0 system for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing of Gram-negative blood culture isolates.QMAC-dRAST V2.0 系统用于革兰氏阴性血培养分离物快速抗生素药敏试验的比较评估。
J Microbiol Methods. 2020 May;172:105902. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105902. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
10
Performance evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST for staphylococci and enterococci isolated from blood culture: a comparative study of performance with the VITEK-2 system.QMAC-dRAST 对血培养分离的葡萄球菌和肠球菌的性能评估:与 VITEK-2 系统比较性能的研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 May 1;73(5):1267-1271. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky015.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct Disk Diffusion Testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship for Gram-Negative Bacteremia in the Context of High Multidrug Resistance.在高多重耐药背景下革兰阴性菌血症的直接药敏试验与抗菌药物管理
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jul 19;14(7):726. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14070726.
2
Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates.评价 QMAC-dRAST 系统版本 2.5 对阳性血培养肉汤和分离培养菌落的革兰氏阴性菌进行快速抗菌药物敏感性测试的效果。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2024 May;38(9):e25043. doi: 10.1002/jcla.25043. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
Risk Factors for Inappropriate Antimicrobial Therapy Among Patients with Hospital-Acquired Infection at Jimma Medical Center: A Prospective Observational Study.
吉姆马医疗中心医院获得性感染患者不适当抗菌治疗的危险因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Mar 4;15:837-850. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S349358. eCollection 2022.
4
A Direct Rapid Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Enables Early Selection of Optimal Antibiotics to Treat Bacteremia in COVID-19 Patients.直接快速表型抗菌药物敏感性试验有助于早期选择最佳抗生素治疗新冠肺炎患者的菌血症。
Infect Chemother. 2021 Dec;53(4):776-785. doi: 10.3947/ic.2021.0139.
5
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Antimicrobial Peptides to Better Predict Efficacy.抗菌肽的药敏试验以更好地预测疗效。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Jul 7;10:326. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00326. eCollection 2020.
6
Risk factors for and clinical outcomes of carbapenem non-susceptible gram negative bacilli bacteremia in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.急性髓系白血病患者碳青霉烯类药物不敏感革兰氏阴性菌菌血症的危险因素和临床结局。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 9;20(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05131-2.
7
Integrating Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing: A Simple and Rapid Approach to Reduce the Turnaround Time in the Management of Blood Cultures.整合细菌鉴定和药敏试验:一种简化和快速的方法,可缩短血培养管理的周转时间。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Oct 3;2019:8041746. doi: 10.1155/2019/8041746. eCollection 2019.