Couffe Cyril, Michael George A
Am J Psychol. 2017;130(2):163-181. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.130.2.0163.
Interruptions of ongoing activities have spread since the development of and global increase in technology use and the general speeding in pace we all experience every day. Their negative effects are well known: decline in performance and emotional distress. However, the literature still needs to shed light on the exact cognitive mechanisms involved in the way users decide to reply to an interruption, on the effects of interruptions of different durations, and on factors influencing reactivation of task schemata and goals at resumption. Therefore, the aim of this article is to review the existing literature and models, uncover unresolved challenges, and propose new ways to confront them. We first review the substantive findings of recent decades from different domains (human-computer interaction, cognitive and experimental psychology, ergonomics), and their respective methodological and theoretical contributions. Then we propose a general and operationalized definition of an interruption; review the different cognitive models of attention, executive control, and working memory that best explain the impact of interruptions; describe current challenges and questions that remain open for future studies; and finally propose an integrative research framework, the DETOUR, which clarifies the cognitive processes at play during interruptions. We believe this work can directly affect the current state of the art, leading to new fundamental studies and applied solutions for the management of interruptions.
自从技术使用发展以及全球范围内人们日常体验到的普遍节奏加快以来,正在进行的活动被打断的情况日益普遍。其负面影响众所周知:工作效率下降和情绪困扰。然而,文献仍需阐明用户决定回应打断所涉及的确切认知机制、不同持续时间的打断的影响,以及影响任务恢复时任务图式和目标重新激活的因素。因此,本文的目的是回顾现有文献和模型,揭示未解决的挑战,并提出应对这些挑战的新方法。我们首先回顾近几十年来不同领域(人机交互、认知与实验心理学、工效学)的实质性研究结果,以及它们各自的方法学和理论贡献。然后我们提出一个通用且可操作的打断定义;回顾最能解释打断影响的注意力、执行控制和工作记忆的不同认知模型;描述当前仍有待未来研究解决的挑战和问题;最后提出一个综合研究框架——DETOUR,它阐明了打断过程中起作用的认知过程。我们相信这项工作能够直接影响当前的技术水平,催生关于打断管理的新基础研究和应用解决方案。