Seo Ji-Hyun, Oh Younglim, Im Sunju, Kim Do-Kyong, Kong Hyun-Hee, Roh HyeRin
Department of Pediatrics and Medical Education, Gyeongsang National Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018 Feb 13;15:4. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.4. eCollection 2018.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the authenticity, acceptability, and feasibility of a hybrid station that combined a standardized patient encounter and a simulated Papanicolaou test.
We introduced a hybrid station in the routine clinical skills examination (CSE) for 335 third-year medical students at 4 universities in Korea from December 1 to December 3, 2014. After the tests, we conducted an anonymous survey on the authenticity, acceptability, and feasibility of the hybrid station.
A total of 334 medical students and 17 professors completed the survey. A majority of the students (71.6%) and professors (82.4%) agreed that the hybrid station was more authentic than the standard CSE. Over 60 percent of the students and professors responded that the station was acceptable for assessing the students' competence. Most of the students (75.2%) and professors (82.4%) assessed the required tasks as being feasible after reading the instructions.
Our results showed that the hybrid CSE station was a highly authentic, acceptable, and feasible way to assess medical students' performance.
本研究的目的是评估一个结合标准化患者问诊和模拟巴氏试验的混合站的真实性、可接受性和可行性。
2014年12月1日至12月3日，我们在韩国4所大学对335名三年级医学生的常规临床技能考试（CSE）中引入了一个混合站。考试结束后，我们对混合站的真实性、可接受性和可行性进行了匿名调查。
共有334名医学生和17名教授完成了调查。大多数学生（71.6%）和教授（82.4%）认为混合站比标准CSE更真实。超过60%的学生和教授回应称该站可用于评估学生的能力。大多数学生（75.2%）和教授（82.4%）在阅读说明后认为所需任务是可行的。
我们的结果表明，混合CSE站是评估医学生表现的一种高度真实、可接受且可行的方式。
