Department of Hematology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Department of Hematology & Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Jul;46(1):74-76. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1633-2.
Three previous reports of PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention failed to find any significant benefit. Recently however, three conflicting reports were published suggesting a benefit in select patients. Although we are enthusiastic for PFO closure in appropriate patients, caution is warranted in the extrapolation of this data and the application of this intervention to broader patient groups. Only small minorities of stroke patients are likely to benefit from PFO closure, the intervention has a notable complication rate, and it has not been compared against modern anticoagulation options. Clinicians should consider all of these points as discussions around PFO closure are likely to become more and more common going forward.
先前有三项关于卵圆孔未闭封堵术预防继发性中风的报告未能发现任何显著益处。然而,最近发表了三项相互矛盾的报告,表明某些特定患者可能从中受益。尽管我们对卵圆孔未闭封堵术在合适的患者中持积极态度,但在将这些数据外推和将该干预措施应用于更广泛的患者群体时需要谨慎。只有少数中风患者可能受益于卵圆孔未闭封堵术,该干预措施存在显著的并发症发生率,并且尚未与现代抗凝治疗方案进行比较。临床医生应考虑所有这些因素,因为随着时间的推移,围绕卵圆孔未闭封堵术的讨论可能会越来越多。