• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝移植中器官分配与分发的新范式

New paradigms for organ allocation and distribution in liver transplantation.

作者信息

Kalra Avash, Biggins Scott W

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.

UW Liver Clinical and Translational Research Center.

出版信息

Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018 May;34(3):123-131. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000434.

DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000434
PMID:29465430
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The 'Final Rule,' issued by the Health Resources and Service Administration in 2000, mandated that liver allocation policy should be based on disease severity and probability of death, and - among other factors - should be independent of a candidate's residence or listing. As a result, the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) has explored policy changes addressing geographic disparities without compromising outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Major paradigm shifts are underway in U.S. liver allocation policy. New hepatocellular carcinoma exception policy incorporates tumor characteristics associated with posttransplantation outcomes, whereas a National Liver Review Board will promote a standardized process for awarding exception points. Meanwhile, following extensive debate, new allocation policy aims to reduce geographic disparity by broadening sharing to the UNOS region and 150-mile circle around the donor hospital for liver transplant candidates with a calculated model for end-stage liver disease score at least 32. Unnecessary organ travel will be reduced by granting 3 'proximity points' to candidates within the same donation service area (DSA) as a liver donor or within 150 nautical miles of the donor hospital, regardless of DSA or UNOS region.

SUMMARY

This review provides an evaluation of major policy changes in liver allocation from 2016 to 2018.

摘要

综述目的

卫生资源与服务管理局于2000年发布的“最终规则”规定,肝脏分配政策应基于疾病严重程度和死亡概率,并且——在其他因素中——应独立于候选人的居住地或登记情况。因此,器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络(UNOS)一直在探索政策变化,以解决地理差异问题,同时不影响治疗效果。

最新发现

美国肝脏分配政策正在发生重大范式转变。新的肝细胞癌例外政策纳入了与移植后结果相关的肿瘤特征,而国家肝脏审查委员会将推动授予例外积分的标准化流程。与此同时,经过广泛辩论,新的分配政策旨在通过将共享范围扩大到UNOS地区以及供体医院周围150英里的区域,来减少地理差异,适用于终末期肝病评分计算模型至少为32分的肝脏移植候选人。对于与肝脏供体在同一捐赠服务区(DSA)内或距离供体医院150海里以内的候选人,无论其DSA或UNOS地区如何,都将给予3个“接近积分”,从而减少不必要的器官运输。

总结

本综述对2016年至2018年肝脏分配的主要政策变化进行了评估。

相似文献

1
New paradigms for organ allocation and distribution in liver transplantation.肝移植中器官分配与分发的新范式
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018 May;34(3):123-131. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000434.
2
Organ distribution without geographic boundaries: A possible framework for organ allocation.打破地域限制的器官分配:器官分配的一种可能框架。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2635-2640. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15115. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
3
Intraregional model for end-stage liver disease score variation in liver transplantation: Disparity in our own backyard.肝移植中区域性终末期肝病模型评分差异:自家后院的差异。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Apr;24(4):488-496. doi: 10.1002/lt.25021.
4
State-Based Liver Distribution: Broad Sharing With Less Harm to Vulnerable and Underserved Communities Compared With Concentric Circles.基于州的肝脏分配:与同心环相比,更广泛的共享对弱势和服务不足的社区造成的伤害更小。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Apr;25(4):588-597. doi: 10.1002/lt.25425. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
Allocation of liver grafts worldwide - Is there a best system?全球肝脏移植的分配 - 是否存在最佳系统?
J Hepatol. 2019 Oct;71(4):707-718. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
MELDEQ : An alternative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.MELDEQ:一种用于肝细胞癌患者的终末期肝病评分替代模型。
Liver Transpl. 2015 May;21(5):612-22. doi: 10.1002/lt.24098. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.固定距离和固定人口圈内肝源供需比的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2044-2052. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15297. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
8
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.肝细胞癌的肝移植:终末期肝病模型(MELD)的影响
Liver Transpl. 2004 Jan;10(1):36-41. doi: 10.1002/lt.20012.
9
Predicting Outcomes on the Liver Transplant Waiting List in the United States: Accounting for Large Regional Variation in Organ Availability and Priority Allocation Points.预测美国肝脏移植等待名单上的结果:考虑器官可获得性和优先分配点数的巨大区域差异
Transplantation. 2016 Oct;100(10):2153-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001384.
10
Geographic disparities in lung transplant rates.肺移植率的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2019 May;19(5):1491-1497. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15182. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Aetiology of chronic liver disease is a valuable factor for stratifying adverse outcomes of acute decompensation: prospective observational study.慢性肝病的病因是对急性失代偿不良结局进行分层的一个重要因素:前瞻性观察性研究。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2428431. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2428431. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
2
What is said about #donateliver or #liverdonor? Reflexive thematic analysis of Twitter (X) posts from 2012 to 2022.关于#捐赠肝脏或#肝脏捐赠者都说了些什么?对2012年至2022年推特(X)帖子的反思性主题分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):1904. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19381-1.
3
Managing a Prospective Liver Transplant Recipient on the Waiting List.
管理等待名单上的潜在肝移植受者。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024 Jan-Feb;14(1):101203. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
Liver Allocation Policies in the USA: Past, Present, and the Future.美国的肝脏分配政策:过去、现在和未来。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Apr;64(4):985-992. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05549-y.
5
Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.固定距离和固定人口圈内肝源供需比的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2044-2052. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15297. Epub 2019 Mar 18.