• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑深部电刺激手术(DBS)后硬件相关感染的管理:成本分析

Management of Hardware Related Infections after DBS Surgery: A Cost Analysis.

作者信息

Wetzelaer Pim, Vlis Tim, Tonge Mehmet, Ackermans Linda, Kubben Pieter, Evers Silvia, Kocabicak Ersoy, Temel Yasin

机构信息

Maastricht University, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(6):929-933. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.21511-17.1.

DOI:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.21511-17.1
PMID:29465741
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the costs of treating the infection with antibiotics only with the risk of surgery when unsuccessful versus immediate removal followed by re-implantation in patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) hardware infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We calculated the costs of the different strategies through a standard costing procedure. A decision model has been applied to establish the average treatment cost per patient representative for a clinical setting where both strategies are employed. Subsequently, a sensitivity analysis has been performed to assess the influence of clinical assumptions regarding the effectiveness of antibiotics treatment on average treatment costs.

RESULTS

The costs of treating a case of DBS hardware infection with immediate internal pulse generator (IPG) replacement surgery were ?29,301 compared to ?9499 for successful antibiotic treatment. For antibiotic treatment followed by IPG replacement surgery the total costs were ?38,741. Antibiotic treatment alone was successful in 44% (4/9) of the included cases of DBS infection, resulting in average treatment costs per patient of ?25,745. Trying to resolve DBS hardware infections initially with antibiotics reduced treatment costs by 12.1%.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with antibiotics with the risk of a later removal when unsuccessful was a more valuable strategy in terms of costs when compared to immediate surgical intervention in cases of hardware-related infections in DBS surgeries.

摘要

目的

探讨对于脑深部电刺激(DBS)硬件感染患者,仅使用抗生素治疗感染(治疗失败时有手术风险)与立即移除硬件随后重新植入相比的治疗成本。

材料与方法

我们通过标准成本核算程序计算了不同策略的成本。应用决策模型来确定在采用这两种策略的临床环境中每位患者的平均治疗成本。随后,进行了敏感性分析,以评估关于抗生素治疗有效性的临床假设对平均治疗成本的影响。

结果

对于DBS硬件感染病例,立即进行植入式脉冲发生器(IPG)置换手术的治疗成本为29,301英镑,而成功进行抗生素治疗的成本为9499英镑。对于先进行抗生素治疗随后进行IPG置换手术,总成本为38,741英镑。在纳入的DBS感染病例中,仅抗生素治疗有44%(4/9)成功,导致每位患者的平均治疗成本为25,745英镑。最初尝试用抗生素解决DBS硬件感染可使治疗成本降低12.1%。

结论

与DBS手术中硬件相关感染时立即进行手术干预相比,使用抗生素治疗(治疗失败时后期有移除风险)在成本方面是一种更有价值的策略。

相似文献

1
Management of Hardware Related Infections after DBS Surgery: A Cost Analysis.脑深部电刺激手术(DBS)后硬件相关感染的管理:成本分析
Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(6):929-933. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.21511-17.1.
2
Management of device-related wound complications in deep brain stimulation surgery.脑深部电刺激术相关装置并发症的处理。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;116(6):1324-32. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.JNS111798. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
3
Reuse of internal pulse generator in cases of infection after deep brain stimulation surgery.脑深部电刺激手术后感染病例中内部脉冲发生器的再利用。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2014;92(3):140-4. doi: 10.1159/000360585. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
4
Antibiotic impregnated catheter coverage of deep brain stimulation leads facilitates lead preservation after hardware infection.抗生素浸渍导管覆盖深部脑刺激导联可在硬件感染后促进导联保留。
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Oct;19(10):1369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
5
The risk of hardware infection in deep brain stimulation surgery is greater at impulse generator replacement than at the primary procedure.在深部脑刺激手术中,更换脉冲发生器时硬件感染的风险比初次手术时更高。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2013;91(1):56-65. doi: 10.1159/000343202. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
6
Changing of the guard: reducing infection when replacing neural pacemakers.换班:更换神经起搏器时减少感染。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;126(4):1165-1172. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS152934. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
7
Infections in Deep Brain Stimulator Surgery.脑深部电刺激手术中的感染
Cureus. 2019 Aug 20;11(8):e5440. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5440.
8
Incidence and Management of Hardware-Related Wound Infections in Spinal Cord, Peripheral Nerve Field, and Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Single-Center Study.脊髓、周围神经区域及脑深部电刺激手术中与硬件相关的伤口感染的发生率及处理:一项单中心研究
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2024;102(1):13-23. doi: 10.1159/000535054. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
9
The incidence of deep brain stimulator hardware infection: the effect of change in antibiotic prophylaxis regimen and review of the literature.脑深部刺激器硬件感染的发生率:抗生素预防方案改变的影响及文献综述
Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Oct;25(5):625-31. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.566384. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
10
Internal Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation: Rechargeable or Not?深部脑刺激中的内置脉冲发生器:是否可充电?
World Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;84(4):1020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Damage to the entire deep brain stimulation system after the standard replacement of an implantable pulse generator, probably due to self-injurious behavior in a patient with advanced Parkinson's disease.在植入式脉冲发生器进行标准更换后,整个深部脑刺激系统受损,可能是由于一名晚期帕金森病患者的自伤行为所致。
Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2025 Jun;34(2):124-129. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2025.151784. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
Economic evaluation of deep brain stimulation compared with vagus nerve stimulation and usual care for patients with refractory epilepsy: A lifetime decision analytic model.深部脑刺激与迷走神经刺激和常规护理治疗耐药性癫痫患者的经济学评价:一种终身决策分析模型。
Epilepsia. 2022 Mar;63(3):641-651. doi: 10.1111/epi.17158. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation: Challenges, Complications, and Strategies for Practicality and Longevity.用于深部脑刺激的植入式脉冲发生器:挑战、并发症以及实用性和寿命的策略
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Aug 26;15:708481. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.708481. eCollection 2021.
4
Surgical Management of Deep Brain Stimulator Infection without Electrode Removal: Report of Two Cases.不取出电极的脑深部电刺激器感染的外科治疗:2例报告
J Neurol Surg Rep. 2020 Jan;81(1):e15-e19. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399569. Epub 2020 Mar 31.