• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰阈下惊恐障碍的早期干预:基于模型的社会视角经济评估。

Early intervention for subthreshold panic disorder in the Netherlands: A model-based economic evaluation from a societal perspective.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Centre of Economic Evaluation, Trimbos Institute (Netherlands Institute for Mental Health and Addiction), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0193338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193338. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0193338
PMID:29466470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5821393/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Panic disorder (PD) is associated with impaired functioning and reduced quality of life. In the Netherlands, almost 2% of the population experiences clinically relevant panic symptoms without meeting the diagnostic criteria for PD, which is referred to as subthreshold PD (STHPD). Evidence suggests that subthreshold mental disorders may have a similar impact on quality of life and functioning in comparison with full-blown mental disorders, which draws attention to the need for interventions for STHPD. These interventions are currently not systematically provided in clinical practice. This study aims to investigate the population cost-effectiveness of adding a CBT-based early intervention for adults with STHPD to the existing health care for people with PD in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A health-economic Markov model was constructed in order to compare quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) and societal costs of adding an early intervention to usual care for PD. The model compares usual care with an alternative program in which usual care is supplemented with a CBT-based early intervention. Input parameters for the model were derived from national sources and published literature where possible, and based on expert opinion otherwise. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the uncertainty of the model input parameters.

RESULTS

On average, the added CBT-based early intervention was dominant in comparison with usual care, meaning that the early intervention yielded more QALYs at lower costs. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY, the cost-effectiveness probability of the added early intervention was 98%. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that offering an early intervention in addition to usual care for PD is potentially cost-effective, but it should be further investigated to what extent trial results can be extrapolated to the level of the population before such interventions are implemented on a large scale.

摘要

背景

恐慌症(PD)与功能障碍和生活质量下降有关。在荷兰,近 2%的人口经历了临床相关的恐慌症状,但不符合 PD 的诊断标准,这被称为亚阈值 PD(STHPD)。有证据表明,亚阈值精神障碍对生活质量和功能的影响可能与全面精神障碍相似,这引起了人们对 STHPD 干预措施的关注。目前,这些干预措施在临床实践中并未系统提供。本研究旨在调查在荷兰,为 STHPD 成年人提供基于认知行为疗法的早期干预措施,以补充现有的 PD 保健服务,从人群角度评估其成本效益。

方法

构建了一个健康经济学 Markov 模型,以比较为 PD 患者提供的常规护理中增加基于认知行为疗法的早期干预与常规护理的质量调整生命年(QALYs)和社会成本。该模型将常规护理与替代方案进行比较,在替代方案中,常规护理辅以基于认知行为疗法的早期干预。模型的输入参数来自国家来源和已发表的文献,在可能的情况下,否则根据专家意见得出。进行了概率和确定性敏感性分析,以评估模型输入参数的不确定性。

结果

平均而言,与常规护理相比,添加的基于认知行为疗法的早期干预具有优势,这意味着早期干预以较低的成本产生了更多的 QALYs。在每 QALY 支付 20,000 欧元的意愿支付阈值下,添加早期干预的成本效益概率为 98%。敏感性分析表明,结果具有稳健性。

结论

本研究表明,为 PD 患者提供常规护理之外的早期干预具有潜在的成本效益,但在大规模实施此类干预措施之前,应进一步研究试验结果在多大程度上可以外推到人群水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea0/5821393/bc34871d4ade/pone.0193338.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea0/5821393/8dd736ba53a9/pone.0193338.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea0/5821393/0d81fb7d48e6/pone.0193338.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea0/5821393/bc34871d4ade/pone.0193338.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea0/5821393/8dd736ba53a9/pone.0193338.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea0/5821393/0d81fb7d48e6/pone.0193338.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aea0/5821393/bc34871d4ade/pone.0193338.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Early intervention for subthreshold panic disorder in the Netherlands: A model-based economic evaluation from a societal perspective.荷兰阈下惊恐障碍的早期干预:基于模型的社会视角经济评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0193338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193338. eCollection 2018.
2
An economic evaluation of an augmented cognitive behavioural intervention vs. computerized cognitive training for post-stroke depressive symptoms.增强型认知行为干预与计算机化认知训练对中风后抑郁症状的经济学评估。
BMC Neurol. 2015 Dec 29;15:266. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0522-y.
3
Preventing Depression in Adults With Subthreshold Depression: Health-Economic Evaluation Alongside a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web-Based Intervention.预防亚阈值抑郁症成年人的抑郁症:基于网络干预的务实随机对照试验的卫生经济学评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 4;19(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6587.
4
Value of information analysis of an early intervention for subthreshold panic disorder: Healthcare versus societal perspective.阈下惊恐障碍早期干预的价值信息分析:医疗保健与社会视角。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):e0205876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205876. eCollection 2018.
5
Economic evaluation of stepped-care versus usual care for depression and anxiety in older adults with vision impairment: randomized controlled trial.针对视力受损老年人的抑郁症和焦虑症,阶梯式护理与常规护理的经济学评估:随机对照试验
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1437-5.
6
Incremental cost-effectiveness of a collaborative care intervention for panic disorder.惊恐障碍协作护理干预的增量成本效益
Psychol Med. 2006 Mar;36(3):353-63. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705006896. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
7
Economic evaluation of an experience sampling method intervention in depression compared with treatment as usual using data from a randomized controlled trial.使用随机对照试验数据评估经验抽样方法干预抑郁症与常规治疗的经济学评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1577-7.
8
Cost utility analysis of a collaborative stepped care intervention for panic and generalized anxiety disorders in primary care.基层医疗中针对惊恐障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍的协作式阶梯式照护干预的成本效用分析
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Jul;77(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Practice Team-Supported Exposure Training for Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia in Primary Care: a Cluster-Randomized Trial.基层医疗中实践团队支持的惊恐障碍和广场恐惧症暴露疗法的成本效益:一项整群随机试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1120-1126. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05658-9. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Cost-effectiveness of specialized treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy versus usual care for tinnitus.基于认知行为疗法的专科治疗与常规护理治疗耳鸣的成本效益比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jun;35(5):787-95. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000331.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Provided Through a Web Application for Subthreshold Depression, Subthreshold Insomnia, and Subthreshold Panic: Open-Labeled 6-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial Pilot Study.通过网络应用程序提供的认知行为疗法对阈下抑郁、阈下失眠和阈下惊恐的疗效:开放标签6臂随机临床试验初步研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 3;9:e63139. doi: 10.2196/63139.
2
Modelling in economic evaluation of mental health prevention: current status and quality of studies.心理健康预防的经济评价中的建模:研究现状和质量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 13;22(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08206-9.
3
The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of interventions for treating anxiety disorders: A systematic review.治疗焦虑症干预措施的成本效益:一项系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 1;210:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
2
Relative effects of cognitive and behavioral therapies on generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder and panic disorder: A meta-analysis.认知行为疗法对广泛性焦虑障碍、社交焦虑障碍和惊恐障碍的相对疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Anxiety Disord. 2016 Oct;43:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.
健康研究中计算建模研究中使用专家 elicitation:系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Jul;42(5):684-703. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211053794. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
4
Economic Evaluations of Public Health Interventions to Improve Mental Health and Prevent Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviours: A Systematic Literature Review.经济评估公共卫生干预措施以改善心理健康和预防自杀意念和行为:系统文献综述。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Mar;48(2):299-315. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01072-9.
5
A mobile application for panic disorder and agoraphobia: Insights from a multi-methods feasibility study.一款针对惊恐障碍和广场恐惧症的移动应用程序:来自多方法可行性研究的见解。
Internet Interv. 2019 Nov 25;19:100296. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100296. eCollection 2020 Mar.
6
Value of information analysis of an early intervention for subthreshold panic disorder: Healthcare versus societal perspective.阈下惊恐障碍早期干预的价值信息分析:医疗保健与社会视角。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):e0205876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205876. eCollection 2018.
EQ-5D五级版本的荷兰关税。
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
4
Efficacy of treatments for anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis.焦虑症治疗方法的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jul;30(4):183-92. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000078.
5
Cost-effectiveness of preventing first-episode psychosis in ultra-high-risk subjects: multi-centre randomized controlled trial.超高风险人群首次发作精神病预防的成本效益:多中心随机对照试验。
Psychol Med. 2015 May;45(7):1435-46. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714002530. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
6
Incremental cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy and two brief cognitive-behavioral therapies compared with usual care for panic disorder and noncardiac chest pain.与惊恐障碍和非心源性胸痛的常规治疗相比,药物治疗和两种简短认知行为疗法的增量成本效益。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Sep;201(9):753-9. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182a2127d.
7
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)——解释与说明:国际卫生经济学会健康经济评估报告指南良好报告实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
8
First-incidence of DSM-IV mood, anxiety and substance use disorders and its determinants: results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2.DSM-IV 心境、焦虑和物质使用障碍的首次发病及其决定因素:来自荷兰精神健康调查和发病研究-2 的结果。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Jul;149(1-3):100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
9
Modeling good research practices--overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--1.模型化良好的研究实践概述:ISPOR-SMDM 模型化良好的研究实践工作组的报告——1.
Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):796-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.012.
10
Health-related quality of life across the anxiety disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions (NESARC).焦虑障碍患者的健康相关生活质量:来自全国酒精相关情况和态度调查(NESARC)的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;72(1):43-50. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05094blu. Epub 2010 Aug 24.