Suppr超能文献

[拉丁美洲决策中的卫生技术评估:良好实践原则]

[Health technology assessment for decision-making in Latin America: good practice principles].

作者信息

Pichon-Riviere Andrés, Soto Natalie C, Augustovski Federico Ariel, García Martí Sebastián, Sampietro-Colom Laura

机构信息

Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina. La correspondencia se debe dirigir a Natalie C Soto. Correo electrónico:

Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 Feb 19;41:e138. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.138.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identify the most relevant, applicable, and priority good practice principles in health technology assessment (HTA) in Latin America, and potential barriers to implementing them in the region.

METHODS

HTA good practice principles postulated worldwide were identified and then explored through a deliberative process in a forum of evaluators, funders, and technology producers.

RESULTS

Forty-two representatives from ten Latin American countries participated in the forum. The good practice principles postulated at the international level were considered valid and potentially applicable in Latin America. Five principles were identified as priorities and as having greater potential to be expanded at this time: transparency in carrying out HTA; involvement of stakeholders in the HTA process; existence of mechanisms to appeal decisions; existence of clear mechanisms for HTA priority-setting; and existence of a clear link between assessment and decision-making. The main challenge identified was to find a balance between application of these principles and available resources, to prevent the planned improvements from jeopardizing report production times and failing to meet decision-makers' needs.

CONCLUSIONS

The main recommendation was to gradually advance in improving HTA and its link to decision-making by developing appropriate processes for each country, without attempting to impose, in the short term, standards taken from examples at the international level without adequate adaptation to the local context.

摘要

目的

确定拉丁美洲卫生技术评估(HTA)中最相关、适用且具优先性的良好实践原则,以及在该地区实施这些原则的潜在障碍。

方法

确定全球范围内提出的HTA良好实践原则,然后在一个由评估人员、资助者和技术生产者组成的论坛上通过审议过程进行探讨。

结果

来自十个拉丁美洲国家的42名代表参加了该论坛。国际层面提出的良好实践原则被认为在拉丁美洲是有效的且具有潜在适用性。确定了五项原则为优先事项且目前具有更大的扩展潜力:开展HTA时的透明度;利益相关者参与HTA过程;存在决策上诉机制;存在明确的HTA优先排序机制;评估与决策之间存在明确联系。确定的主要挑战是在应用这些原则与可用资源之间找到平衡,以防止计划中的改进危及报告制作时间且无法满足决策者的需求。

结论

主要建议是通过为每个国家制定适当的流程,逐步推进改善HTA及其与决策的联系,而不是在短期内试图强行采用未经充分适应当地情况的国际范例标准。

相似文献

2
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR DECISION MAKING IN LATIN AMERICA: GOOD PRACTICE PRINCIPLES.拉丁美洲卫生技术评估决策:良好实践原则。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(3):241-247. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000326. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
4
STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT IN THE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN LATIN AMERICA.利益相关方参与拉丁美洲的卫生技术评估过程。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(3):248-253. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000302. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
7
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.

本文引用的文献

2
Toward international good practices in health technology assessment.迈向卫生技术评估的国际良好实践。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Apr;28(2):169-70. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000189.
3
Describe decision-making systems, assess health technology assessment reports.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Apr;28(2):168. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000177.
4
Consider context and stakeholders.考虑背景和利益相关者。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Apr;28(2):166-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000153. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
6
Health systems financing and the path to universal coverage.卫生系统筹资与全民覆盖之路。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jun;88(6):402. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.078741.
10
Justice, health, and healthcare.正义、健康与医疗保健。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Spring;1(2):2-16. doi: 10.1162/152651601300168834.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验