1 Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Division of Epidemiology, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia.
5 Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo, Norway .
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Jul 15;35(14):1596-1603. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5299. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
A better understanding of long-term functional recovery process for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) facilitates effective rehabilitations. The aim of this study was to classify and characterize patients with moderate-to-severe TBI based on their functional trajectories up to 5 years post-injury. The study included 121 patients with moderate-to-severe TBIs (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10], S06.0-S06.9), 16-55 years of age, and admitted at Trauma Referral Hospital within 24 h of injury between 2005 and 2007. Demographics and injury characteristics were documented at the admission, and functional status was recorded at 3 months and 1 and 5 years post-injury using Functional Independence Measure motor (FIM-M) and cognitive (FIM-C) subscales. We used group-based trajectory models to classify patients' functional trajectories over a 5-year period. For FIM-M, three trajectories were identified: 8.2% of patients showed stable low recovery (13.6 ± 1.5, 17.9 ± 8.8, and 21.0 ± 17.9), 9.2% elevated good recovery (35.8 ± 14.5, 75.5 ± 12.4, and 85.5 ± 8.1), and 82.6% stable good recovery (89.0 ± 3.6, 90.3 ± 1.9, and 90.8 ± 1.0) at the three follow-up points, respectively. For FIM-C, four trajectories were revealed: 4.1% of patients showed stable low recovery (5.0 ± 0, 5.0 ± 0, and 5.0 ± 0), 12.6% delayed moderate recovery (8.9 ± 3.5, 20.6 ± 4.6, and 28.3 ± 3.8), 28.7% elevated good recovery (27.0 ± 3.8, 30.4 ± 7.3, and 31.1 ± 2.3), and 54.6% stable good recovery (32.8 ± 2.3, 34.6 ± 1.0, and 34.7 ± 1.0). The results suggest that three FIM-M and four FIM-C trajectories described various patterns of functional recovery 5 years after moderate-to-severe TBI, with stable good recovery being the most common trajectory. Identifying and characterizing the trajectory memberships should enable targeted rehabilitation programs, inform patient-centered care, and improve long-term outcomes.
对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的长期功能恢复过程有更好的了解有助于进行有效的康复治疗。本研究的目的是根据患者受伤后 5 年内的功能轨迹对中度至重度 TBI 患者进行分类和特征描述。该研究纳入了 121 名年龄在 16-55 岁之间、在 2005 年至 2007 年受伤后 24 小时内入住创伤转诊医院且 ICD-10 编码为 S06.0-S06.9 的中度至重度 TBI 患者。在入院时记录患者的人口统计学和损伤特征,并在受伤后 3 个月、1 年和 5 年使用功能独立性测量运动(FIM-M)和认知(FIM-C)分量表记录功能状态。我们使用基于群组的轨迹模型对患者在 5 年内的功能轨迹进行分类。对于 FIM-M,确定了 3 种轨迹:8.2%的患者表现出稳定的低恢复(13.6±1.5、17.9±8.8 和 21.0±17.9)、9.2%的患者表现出较高的良好恢复(35.8±14.5、75.5±12.4 和 85.5±8.1)和 82.6%的患者表现出稳定的良好恢复(89.0±3.6、90.3±1.9 和 90.8±1.0),在这三个随访点分别为。对于 FIM-C,揭示了 4 种轨迹:4.1%的患者表现出稳定的低恢复(5.0±0、5.0±0 和 5.0±0)、12.6%的患者表现出延迟的中度恢复(8.9±3.5、20.6±4.6 和 28.3±3.8)、28.7%的患者表现出较高的良好恢复(27.0±3.8、30.4±7.3 和 31.1±2.3)和 54.6%的患者表现出稳定的良好恢复(32.8±2.3、34.6±1.0 和 34.7±1.0)。结果表明,3 种 FIM-M 和 4 种 FIM-C 轨迹描述了中度至重度 TBI 后 5 年功能恢复的不同模式,稳定的良好恢复是最常见的轨迹。确定和描述轨迹成员资格应能实现有针对性的康复计划,为以患者为中心的护理提供信息,并改善长期结果。