Li Jingchao, Li Xiaodong, Dong Shujuan, Yang Yapan, Chu Yingjie
Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, P.R. China.
Department of Radiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Mar;15(3):2620-2626. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5661. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
The value of the right bundle branch block (RBBB) in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction remains unclear. Studies on the RBBB may significantly influence the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. A total of 845 patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary angiography at Henan Provincial People's Hospital were analyzed. Higher peak enzyme levels, a higher ratio of Killip ≥II and closer proximal occlusion of infarct-related artery (IRA) were observed in patients with RBBB compared with those without. The ratio of TIMI flow 0/1 of IRA and ratio of received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to IRA in the RBBB group were significantly higher compared with those in the left (L) BBB or no BBB groups. The in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) incidence in the RBBB group was higher compared with that in the no BBB group, but there was no significant difference between the RBBB and LBBB groups. Logistic regression revealed that proximal occlusion and TIMI flow 0/1 of IRA were predictive factors of RBBB. Cox regression analysis identified RBBB [risk ratio (RR), 4.682; P<0.001] and LBBB (RR, 3.687; P<0.001) as independent predictors of in-hospital MACE. The cumulative one-year survival rate in the RBBB group was significantly lower than those in the no BBB group (P<0.05) and the LBBB group (P<0.05). Similar to the guidelines regarding new onset of LBBB, new onset RBBB should be considered as a standard indicator for reperfusion therapy; as RBBB is associated with more severe symptoms, and higher incidents of complete occlusion of IRA and primary PCI treatment compared with LBBB.
右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)在急性心肌梗死治疗中的价值仍不明确。关于RBBB的研究可能会显著影响急性心肌梗死的治疗。对河南省人民医院845例行急诊冠状动脉造影的急性心肌梗死患者进行了分析。与无RBBB的患者相比,RBBB患者的酶峰值水平更高、Killip≥II级比例更高且梗死相关动脉(IRA)近端闭塞更接近。与左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)组或无束支传导阻滞组相比,RBBB组IRA的TIMI血流0/1级比例及接受IRA直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的比例显著更高。RBBB组的院内主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率高于无束支传导阻滞组,但RBBB组与LBBB组之间无显著差异。Logistic回归显示,IRA近端闭塞和TIMI血流0/1级是RBBB的预测因素。Cox回归分析确定RBBB[风险比(RR),4.682;P<0.001]和LBBB(RR,3.687;P<0.001)是院内MACE的独立预测因素。RBBB组的1年累积生存率显著低于无束支传导阻滞组(P<0.05)和LBBB组(P<0.05)。与关于新发LBBB的指南类似,新发RBBB应被视为再灌注治疗的标准指标;因为与LBBB相比,RBBB与更严重的症状、更高的IRA完全闭塞发生率及直接PCI治疗发生率相关。