Bukowski Alexandra R, Schittko Conrad, Petermann Jana S
Institute of Biology Freie Universität Berlin Berlin Germany.
Institute of Biochemistry and Biology Biodiversity Research/Systematic Botany University of Potsdam Potsdam Germany.
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jan 26;8(4):2280-2289. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3755. eCollection 2018 Feb.
One of the processes that may play a key role in plant species coexistence and ecosystem functioning is plant-soil feedback, the effect of plants on associated soil communities and the resulting feedback on plant performance. Plant-soil feedback at the interspecific level (comparing growth on own soil with growth on soil from different species) has been studied extensively, while plant-soil feedback at the intraspecific level (comparing growth on own soil with growth on soil from different accessions within a species) has only recently gained attention. Very few studies have investigated the direction and strength of feedback among different taxonomic levels, and initial results have been inconclusive, discussing phylogeny, and morphology as possible determinants. To test our hypotheses that the strength of negative feedback on plant performance increases with increasing taxonomic level and that this relationship is explained by morphological similarities, we conducted a greenhouse experiment using species assigned to three taxonomic levels (intraspecific, interspecific, and functional group level). We measured certain fitness-related aboveground traits and used them along literature-derived traits to determine the influence of morphological similarities on the strength and direction of the feedback. We found that the average strength of negative feedback increased from the intraspecific over the interspecific to the functional group level. However, individual accessions and species differed in the direction and strength of the feedback. None of our results could be explained by morphological dissimilarities or individual traits. . Our results indicate that negative plant-soil feedback is stronger if the involved plants belong to more distantly related species. We conclude that the taxonomic level is an important factor in the maintenance of plant coexistence with plant-soil feedback as a potential stabilizing mechanism and should be addressed explicitly in coexistence research, while the traits considered here seem to play a minor role.
在植物物种共存和生态系统功能中可能发挥关键作用的过程之一是植物 - 土壤反馈,即植物对相关土壤群落的影响以及由此产生的对植物表现的反馈。种间水平的植物 - 土壤反馈(比较植物在自身土壤上的生长与在不同物种土壤上的生长)已得到广泛研究,而种内水平的植物 - 土壤反馈(比较植物在自身土壤上的生长与在同一物种内不同种质土壤上的生长)直到最近才受到关注。很少有研究调查不同分类水平之间反馈的方向和强度,初步结果尚无定论,讨论了系统发育和形态学作为可能的决定因素。为了检验我们的假设,即对植物表现的负反馈强度随着分类水平的增加而增加,并且这种关系可以由形态相似性来解释,我们进行了一项温室实验,使用了分配到三个分类水平(种内、种间和功能组水平)的物种。我们测量了某些与适合度相关的地上性状,并将它们与文献中得出的性状一起用于确定形态相似性对反馈强度和方向的影响。我们发现,负反馈的平均强度从种内水平到种间水平再到功能组水平逐渐增加。然而,各个种质和物种在反馈的方向和强度上存在差异。我们的结果均无法用形态差异或个体性状来解释。我们的结果表明,如果涉及的植物属于亲缘关系更远的物种,植物 - 土壤负反馈会更强。我们得出结论,分类水平是植物共存维持中的一个重要因素,植物 - 土壤反馈作为一种潜在的稳定机制,应在共存研究中明确加以考虑,而这里所考虑的性状似乎作用较小。