Institute and Out-Patient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schillerstrasse 25/29, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018 May;91(4):467-477. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1296-5. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
The permeability coefficient (K) is often used for prediction of the dermal penetration of chemicals. Mathematical models have mostly been derived on K data basis. However, confusing K values are reported, questioning the general reliability of this parameter. In this study, we tested the plausibility of K values expressing the dermal penetration velocity (cm h) of chemicals on a larger dataset from literature.
K was applied for the calculation of the time for penetration through skin membranes of defined thickness (t). K values were obtained from Flynn's dataset (1990), containing data determined mostly under similar experimental conditions using diffusion cells. Further skin penetration parameters, e.g., times at which the chemicals were firstly measured in the receptor phase, lag times, steady-state times, and exposure duration, where available, were related to K values. The data congruence was tested comparing K values from Flynn's dataset with those reported in the EDETOX database. Variables, which could bias the results, such as different experimental protocols and research groups were also considered.
K data for 94 chemicals matched the inclusion criteria were evaluated. According to the K values, 21 (22%) compounds would require longer than 100 h, and 20 (21%) further compounds longer than 10 h of exposure to penetrate skin membranes of ~ 0.01-2.5 mm thickness. Obviously, erroneous K were found in studies of almost all research groups in Flynn's database, indicating that neither the observer nor the experimental conditions alone biased the values.
Our evaluation demonstrates high implausibility of K values to represent the dermal penetration velocity and supports general invalidity of the parameter for implementation in studies using skin membranes. The K should not be used to characterize the percutaneous penetration of chemicals or in risk assessment without verification.
渗透系数(K)常用于预测化学物质的经皮渗透。数学模型大多是基于 K 数据推导出来的。然而,报告的 K 值令人困惑,质疑该参数的普遍可靠性。在这项研究中,我们在更大的文献数据集上测试了 K 值表示化学物质经皮渗透速度(cm h)的合理性。
应用 K 值计算穿透具有规定厚度的皮肤膜所需的时间(t)。K 值来自 Flynn 数据集(1990 年),其中包含的大多数数据是在使用扩散池的类似实验条件下确定的。进一步的皮肤渗透参数,例如,化学物质首次在受体相中测量的时间、滞后时间、稳定时间和暴露时间(如果可用),与 K 值相关。通过比较 Flynn 数据集和 EDETOX 数据库中报告的 K 值来测试数据的一致性。还考虑了可能影响结果的变量,例如不同的实验方案和研究小组。
评估了符合纳入标准的 94 种化学物质的 K 值数据。根据 K 值,21(22%)种化合物需要超过 100 小时,20(21%)种进一步化合物需要超过 10 小时的暴露才能穿透厚度约为 0.01-2.5mm 的皮肤膜。显然,Flynn 数据库中几乎所有研究小组的研究都发现了错误的 K 值,这表明无论是观察者还是实验条件本身都没有对这些值产生偏差。
我们的评估表明 K 值表示经皮渗透速度的可能性非常低,并支持该参数在使用皮肤膜的研究中普遍无效。在没有验证的情况下,K 值不应用于表征化学物质的经皮渗透或用于风险评估。