• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于1年的EINSTEIN-Extension试验疗效和安全性结果,利伐沙班持续抗凝与安慰剂的成本比较。

Cost comparison of continued anticoagulation with rivaroxaban versus placebo based on the 1-year EINSTEIN-Extension trial efficacy and safety results.

作者信息

Wells Philip S, Lensing Anthonie W A, Haskell Lloyd, Levitan Bennett, Laliberté François, Durkin Michael, Ashton Veronica, Xiao Yongling, Crivera Concetta, Lejeune Dominique, Schein Jeff, Lefebvre Patrick

机构信息

a Department of Medicine , University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa , ON , Canada.

b Bayer Pharma AG , Wuppertal , Germany.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2018 Jun;21(6):587-594. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1444615. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1080/13696998.2018.1444615
PMID:29469638
Abstract

AIMS

The EINSTEIN-Extension trial (EINSTEIN-EXT) found that continued treatment with rivaroxaban for an additional 6 or 12 months (vs placebo) after 6-12 months of initial anticoagulation significantly reduced the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) with a small non-significant increased risk of major bleeding (none fatal or in critical site). This study aimed to compare total healthcare cost between rivaroxaban and placebo, based on the EINSTEIN-EXT event rates.

METHODS

Total healthcare cost was calculated as the sum of treatment and clinical event costs from a US managed care perspective. Treatment duration and event rates were obtained from the EINSTEIN-EXT study. Adjustment on treatment duration was made by assuming a 10% non-adherence rate. Drug costs were based on wholesale acquisition costs. Cost estimates for clinical events (i.e. recurrent deep vein thrombosis [DVT], recurrent pulmonary embolism, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding) were determined from the literature. Results were examined over a ±20% range of each cost component and over 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of event rate differences in deterministic (one-way) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).

RESULTS

Total healthcare cost was $1,454 lower for rivaroxaban-treated (vs placebo-treated) patients in the base-case, with a lower clinical event cost fully offsetting drug cost. The cost savings of recurrent DVT alone (-$3,102) was greater than drug cost ($2,723). Total healthcare cost remained lower for rivaroxaban in the majority (73%) of PSA (cost difference [95% CI] = -$1,454 [-$2,396, $1,231]).

LIMITATIONS

This study was conducted over the 1-year observation period of the EINSTEIN-EXT trial, which limited "real-world" applicability and examination of long-term economic impact. Assumptions on drug and clinical event costs were US-based and, thus, not applicable to other healthcare systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Total healthcare costs were estimated to be lower for patients continuing rivaroxaban therapy compared to those receiving placebo in VTE patients who had completed 6-12 months of VTE treatment.

摘要

目的

“爱因斯坦-拓展”试验(EINSTEIN-EXT)发现,在初始抗凝治疗6至12个月后,继续使用利伐沙班额外治疗6个月或12个月(与安慰剂相比)可显著降低复发性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险,同时大出血风险有小幅增加但未达显著水平(均非致命性或发生在关键部位)。本研究旨在根据EINSTEIN-EXT的事件发生率,比较利伐沙班和安慰剂的总医疗费用。

方法

从美国管理式医疗的角度,将总医疗费用计算为治疗费用和临床事件费用之和。治疗持续时间和事件发生率取自EINSTEIN-EXT研究。通过假设10%的不依从率对治疗持续时间进行调整。药品成本基于批发采购成本。临床事件(即复发性深静脉血栓形成[DVT]、复发性肺栓塞、大出血、临床相关非大出血)的成本估计来自文献。在确定性(单向)和概率敏感性分析(PSA)中,对每个成本组成部分的±20%范围以及事件发生率差异的95%置信区间(CI)进行结果检验。

结果

在基础病例中,接受利伐沙班治疗的患者(与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比)总医疗费用低1454美元,较低的临床事件成本完全抵消了药品成本。仅复发性DVT节省的成本(-3102美元)就大于药品成本(2723美元)。在大多数(73%)的PSA中,利伐沙班的总医疗费用仍然较低(成本差异[95%CI]=-1454[-2396,1231]美元)。

局限性

本研究是在EINSTEIN-EXT试验的1年观察期内进行的,这限制了“真实世界”的适用性以及对长期经济影响进行考察。药品和临床事件成本的假设基于美国,因此不适用于其他医疗体系。

结论

对于已完成6至12个月VTE治疗的VTE患者,继续接受利伐沙班治疗的患者估计总医疗费用低于接受安慰剂治疗的患者。

相似文献

1
Cost comparison of continued anticoagulation with rivaroxaban versus placebo based on the 1-year EINSTEIN-Extension trial efficacy and safety results.基于1年的EINSTEIN-Extension试验疗效和安全性结果,利伐沙班持续抗凝与安慰剂的成本比较。
J Med Econ. 2018 Jun;21(6):587-594. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1444615. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
2
Health-care Cost Impact of Continued Anticoagulation With Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin for Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic VTE in the EINSTEIN-CHOICE Trial Population.EINSTEIN-CHOICE 试验人群中利伐沙班与阿司匹林用于预防复发性有症状 VTE 的持续抗凝对医疗成本的影响。
Chest. 2018 Dec;154(6):1371-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.1059. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rivaroxaban for treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in the Netherlands.利伐沙班用于荷兰静脉血栓栓塞治疗及二级预防的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2017 Aug;20(8):813-824. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1331912. Epub 2017 Jun 25.
4
Indirect comparison and cost-utility of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban in the treatment and extended anticoagulation of venous thromboembolism in a UK setting.在英国背景下,达比加群酯与利伐沙班在静脉血栓栓塞治疗及延长抗凝治疗中的间接比较和成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2016;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1078340. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of extended duration anticoagulation with rivaroxaban to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism.利伐沙班延长疗程抗凝预防复发性静脉血栓栓塞的成本效益分析。
Thromb Res. 2014 May;133(5):743-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
6
Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus apixaban for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism and extended prevention of recurrences in the UK.在英国,利伐沙班与阿哌沙班治疗静脉血栓栓塞初始治疗和延长复发预防的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2019 Nov;22(11):1179-1191. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1658589. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
The use of rivaroxaban for short- and long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism.利伐沙班在静脉血栓栓塞症的短期和长期治疗中的应用。
Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jun;107(6):1035-43. doi: 10.1160/TH11-12-0859. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
8
Comparison of differences in medical costs when new oral anticoagulants are used for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism vs warfarin or placebo in the US.在美国,新型口服抗凝剂用于治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动和静脉血栓栓塞患者时与华法林或安慰剂相比的医疗成本差异比较。
J Med Econ. 2015 Jun;18(6):399-409. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1007210. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
9
Evaluation of medical costs associated with use of new oral anticoagulants compared with standard therapy among venous thromboembolism patients.静脉血栓栓塞症患者中,新型口服抗凝剂与标准治疗相比的医疗费用评估。
J Med Econ. 2014 Nov;17(11):763-70. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.950670. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
10
Long-term Anticoagulation With Rivaroxaban for Preventing Recurrent VTE: A Benefit-Risk Analysis of EINSTEIN-Extension.利伐沙班长期抗凝预防静脉血栓栓塞复发:EINSTEIN-Extension研究的获益-风险分析
Chest. 2016 Nov;150(5):1059-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.05.023. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and clinical impact of bleeding events in older patients with acute venous thromboembolism.老年急性静脉血栓栓塞症患者出血事件的发生率及临床影响。
Blood Adv. 2023 Jan 24;7(2):205-213. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007263.
2
Extended anticoagulation for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events: An updated network meta-analysis.延长抗凝治疗用于静脉血栓栓塞事件的二级预防:一项更新的网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 1;14(4):e0214134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214134. eCollection 2019.