Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 May;126(5):317-325. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21984. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology category of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) includes fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens that cannot straightforwardly be classified as benign or malignant. To determine whether morphological subcategorization based on atypia qualifiers and molecular testing could improve malignancy risk stratification of AUS/FLUS patients, this study assessed the correlation between these qualifiers and the molecular alterations commonly harbored by thyroid neoplasms.
A total of 162 AUS/FLUS cases were subcategorized by atypia qualifiers (Hürthle cell changes, architectural atypia, and cytologic atypia [CyA]) and were tested for BRAF, N-H-KRAS, RET/PTC, and paired box 8 (PAX8)/peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARg) mutations.
CyA was observed more frequently in mutation-positive AUS/FLUS (14 of 37 [37.84%]) than mutation-negative AUS/FLUS (20 of 125 [16.00%]; P < .0084), and it specifically harbored the BRAFV600E point mutation. Malignancy was confirmed in the available follow-up. Conversely, although RAS was the most frequent mutation identified in AUS/FLUS FNA specimens (26 of 37 cases [70.27%]; P < .0001), it was distributed across various AUS/FLUS subcategories and was not significantly associated with a specific atypia qualifier or malignant outcome according to the available follow-up. Rearrangements of both RET/PTC (n = 1) and PAX8/PPARg (n = 3) were rarely retrieved in the FNA samples.
BRAF and RAS mutations are associated with different AUS/FLUS qualifiers and hence have different risks of malignancy. Consequently, a hybrid molecular and morphological subcategorization system could improve the malignancy risk stratification of thyroid FNA samples diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:317-25. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
甲状腺细针抽吸细胞学报告的 Bethesda 系统中不典型/滤泡性肿瘤不确定意义(AUS/FLUS)类别包括不能直接归类为良性或恶性的细针抽吸标本。为了确定基于不典型性的形态学细分和分子检测是否可以改善 AUS/FLUS 患者的恶性风险分层,本研究评估了这些分类器与甲状腺肿瘤常见的分子改变之间的相关性。
总共对 162 例 AUS/FLUS 病例进行了不典型性分类器(Hurthle 细胞改变、结构异型性和细胞学异型性[CyA])的细分,并进行了 BRAF、N-H-KRAS、RET/PTC 和配对盒 8(PAX8)/过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体 γ(PPARg)突变检测。
CyA 在突变阳性 AUS/FLUS 中比突变阴性 AUS/FLUS 更常见(37 例中有 14 例[37.84%]比 125 例中有 20 例[16.00%];P <.0084),且特异性携带 BRAFV600E 点突变。在可获得的随访中确认了恶性肿瘤。相反,尽管 RAS 是在 AUS/FLUS FNA 标本中最常见的突变(37 例中有 26 例[70.27%];P <.0001),但它分布在各种 AUS/FLUS 亚类中,根据可获得的随访结果,与特定的不典型性分类器或恶性结局无显著相关性。在 FNA 样本中很少发现 RET/PTC(n = 1)和 PAX8/PPARg(n = 3)的重排。
BRAF 和 RAS 突变与不同的 AUS/FLUS 分类器相关,因此具有不同的恶性风险。因此,一种混合的分子和形态学细分系统可以改善诊断为 AUS/FLUS 的甲状腺 FNA 样本的恶性风险分层。癌症细胞学与病理学 2018;126:317-25。版权所有 2018 年美国癌症协会。