Suppr超能文献

《Mini-Cog 管理和评分的图形说明:一项随机临床试验结果》。

Graphical Instructions for Administration and Scoring the Mini-Cog: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Medicine Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 May;66(5):987-991. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15313. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a novel set of graphical Mini-Cog instructions designed to aid clinicians previously untrained on the Mini-Cog in accurate administration and scoring and to determine whether use of these graphical instructions improved the speed and accuracy of deployment of this tool.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Testing was conducted in a simulated environment with a mock patient.

PARTICIPANTS

Registered nurses working in inpatient or outpatient settings at a large academic medical center who had no prior exposure to or training with the Mini-Cog (N=92).

MEASUREMENTS

Our primary outcome was the composite proportion of nurses who made errors in administration or scoring of the Mini-Cog.

RESULTS

None of the nurses in the graphical instruction group and 28 (61%) in the standardized instructions group (15 (33%) made administration errors, 22 (48%) made scoring errors) made errors. Nurses randomly assigned to the graphical group were able to read (median 36 vs 54 seconds, P<.001), administer (46 vs 62 seconds, P<.001), and score (15 vs 84 seconds, P<.001) the Mini-Cog more quickly than those in the standardized instructions group.

CONCLUSION

Graphical instructions increase the accuracy and speed of test administration in nurses without prior training in Mini-Cog administration. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings and evaluate the use of this method in other healthcare professionals and settings.

摘要

目的

开发一套新的 Mini-Cog 图形化指令,旨在帮助以前未接受过 Mini-Cog 培训的临床医生进行准确的管理和评分,并确定使用这些图形化指令是否能提高该工具的部署速度和准确性。

设计

随机临床试验。

设置

在模拟环境中对模拟患者进行测试。

参与者

在大型学术医疗中心的住院或门诊环境中工作的注册护士,他们以前没有接触过或接受过 Mini-Cog 的培训(N=92)。

测量

我们的主要结果是护士在管理或评分 Mini-Cog 时出错的复合比例。

结果

图形化指令组中没有护士,而标准化指令组中有 28 名护士(61%)出错(15 名(33%)出现管理错误,22 名(48%)出现评分错误)。随机分配到图形组的护士能够更快地阅读(中位数 36 秒与 54 秒,P<.001)、管理(46 秒与 62 秒,P<.001)和评分(15 秒与 84 秒,P<.001)Mini-Cog。

结论

在没有 Mini-Cog 管理培训的护士中,图形化指令提高了测试管理的准确性和速度。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现,并评估在其他医疗保健专业人员和环境中使用这种方法的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验