Mask Andrew, Adepoju Omolola E
J Healthc Qual. 2019 Jan/Feb;41(1):10-16. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000132.
We compare hospital readmission rates by accountable care organization (ACO) status with national readmission averages, to determine whether ACO affiliation influences 30-day hospital-wide readmission rates.
Data from the 2015 American Hospital Association Survey of Care Systems and Payment database were merged with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid's 2015 Hospital Compare Deaths and Readmissions data set. A multinomial logistic regression model is used to examine readmission rates, categorized as better, no different, or worse, in comparison to national averages, by ACO status.
Compared with Non-ACO hospitals and holding the covariates constant, the relative risk of having better than national average readmissions was 1.85 in Medicare ACO hospitals (p = .36). Compared with facilities in the Northeast region, the relative risk of having better than national average readmissions was 2.21 for facilities in the West (p = .10). Facilities in the Midwest and Southern regions had a lower risk of having better than national average rates (Relative Risk: 0.90 and 0.23, respectively; p = .83 and .06, respectively). As hospital beds increase, facilities have significantly lower risks of having worse than national average readmissions.
Overall, the ACO status did not significantly improve readmissions. However, Medicare ACOs performed better than non-Medicare ACOs and those hospitals without any reported ACO arrangements.
我们将按责任医疗组织(ACO)状态划分的医院再入院率与全国再入院平均水平进行比较,以确定加入ACO是否会影响全院30天再入院率。
将2015年美国医院协会医疗系统与支付调查数据库中的数据与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心2015年医院比较死亡与再入院数据集进行合并。使用多项逻辑回归模型,按ACO状态检查与全国平均水平相比归类为更好、无差异或更差的再入院率。
与非ACO医院相比且保持协变量不变,医疗保险ACO医院再入院情况优于全国平均水平的相对风险为1.85(p = 0.36)。与东北地区的机构相比,西部地区机构再入院情况优于全国平均水平的相对风险为2.21(p = 0.10)。中西部和南部地区的机构再入院情况优于全国平均水平的风险较低(相对风险分别为0.90和0.23;p分别为0.83和0.06)。随着医院病床数量增加,机构再入院情况差于全国平均水平的风险显著降低。
总体而言,ACO状态并未显著改善再入院情况。然而,医疗保险ACO的表现优于非医疗保险ACO以及那些未报告任何ACO安排的医院。