PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF RADIATION DOSE TO PATIENTS FROM CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES IN TANZANIA.

Although contemporary cardiac X-ray exams are typically set so benefits outweighs the risk, the growing use and increasing complexity of the cardiovascular interventional radiological (CVIR) procedures does increase the risk of radiation-related tissue effects and stochastic effects to the individual patients and the population. In view of these radiological concerns there is a need to investigate factors that influence the doses received by the patients and enable optimisation needed. The air kerma area product (KAP), cumulative air kerma (CAK) and fluoroscopy time (FT) to patients from two major CVIR procedures: coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), were obtained from two major hospitals in Tanzania. The CAK and KAP were determined using ionisation chambers equipped in each angiographic unit. The median values of the KAP, CAK and FT for the CA procedures were 37.8 Gy cm2, 425.5 mGy and 7.6 min, respectively, while for the PCI were 86.5 Gy cm2, 1180.3 mGy and 19.0 min, respectively. The overall differences among individual KAP, CAK and FT values across the two hospitals investigated differed by factors of up to 33.5, 58.7 and 26.3 for the CA, while for the PCI procedures differed by factors of up to 10.9, 25.3 and 13.8, respectively. The mean values of KAP and FT for both CA and PCI were mostly higher than those reported values for Ireland, Belgium, Greece, France, China and Australia. The third quartiles of the KAP, CAK and FT for both CA and PCI were relatively above the preliminary diagnostic reference levels proposed by the IAEA, DIMOND III and SENTINEL. The observed substantial variations of mean values of technical parameters and patient doses (KAP, CAK and FT values) observed for the CA and PCI procedures inter and intra-hospitals were mainly explained by the complexity of the CVIR procedures, the nature of pathology, patient-specific characteristics, the variation in levels of skills and experiences among IC personnel, and the different procedural protocols employed among interventional cardiologists and hospitals. The observed great variations of procedural protocols and patient doses within and across the hospitals and relative higher dose than reported values from the literature call for the need to optimise radiation dose to patient from IC procedures.