COHERE - Health Economics Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Department of Public Health and Department of Political Science, Center for Healthy Aging and Center for Health Economics and Policy, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Health Policy. 2018 Apr;122(4):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
Denmark implemented a major reform of the administrative and political structure in 2007 when the previous 13 counties were merged into five new regions and the number of municipalities was reduced from 271 to 98. A main objective was to create administrative units that were large enough to support a hospital structure with few acute hospitals in each region and to centralize specialized care in fewer hospitals. This paper analyses the reorganization of the somatic hospital sector in Denmark since 2007, discusses the mechanisms behind the changes and analyses hospital performance after the reform. The reform focused on improving acute services and quality of care. The number of acute hospitals was reduced from about 40-21 hospitals with new joint acute facilities, which include emergency care wards. The restructuring and geographical placement of acute hospitals took place in a democratic process subject to central guidelines and requirements. Since the reform, hospital productivity has increased by more than 2 per cent per year and costs have been stable. Overall, indicators point to a successful reform. However, it has also been criticized that some people in remote areas feel "left behind" in the economic development and that hospital staff are under increased workload pressure. Concurrent with the centralization of hospitals municipalities strengthened their health service with an emphasis on prevention and health promotion.
丹麦于 2007 年对行政和政治结构进行了重大改革,此前的 13 个县合并为 5 个新地区,市镇数量从 271 个减少到 98 个。主要目标是创建足够大的行政单位,以支持每个地区只有少数几家急性医院的医院结构,并将专科护理集中在少数几家医院。本文分析了丹麦自 2007 年以来的躯体医院部门的重组,讨论了变革背后的机制,并分析了改革后的医院绩效。改革的重点是改善急症服务和护理质量。急性医院的数量从约 40-21 家减少到了新的联合急性设施,其中包括急诊病房。急性医院的重组和地理布局是在一个民主的过程中进行的,该过程受到中央指导方针和要求的约束。自改革以来,医院的生产力每年增加超过 2%,成本保持稳定。总体而言,指标表明改革取得了成功。然而,也有人批评说,一些偏远地区的人感到在经济发展中“落后”,而且医院工作人员的工作负荷压力增大。与此同时,随着医院的集中化,市政府加强了其卫生服务,重点是预防和促进健康。