Machado Jessica P, Lam Xuan T, Chen Jung-Wei
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Program Director of Advanced Education in Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Dent Traumatol. 2018 Apr;34(2):120-128. doi: 10.1111/edt.12390.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Studies reveal many dental students and general dentists have inadequate knowledge about treating children who sustain traumatic dental injuries. The aims of this study were to assess dental trauma knowledge among novice clinicians and expert pediatric dentists and determine the effectiveness of a clinical decision support tool (CDST) for the management of trauma scenarios. A secondary purpose was to compare the effects of a print and mobile app format of the CDST.
A print and mobile app CDST was developed based upon current AAPD and IADT clinical guidelines. Baseline knowledge for dental students (n = 84) and pediatric dentists (n = 60) was assessed using a multiple-choice Pre-test. A Post-test was used to evaluate changes in the knowledge level following the random assignment of participants into 3 groups: Group A (control) had no CDST provided; Group B (print CDST) had access to the print paper pamphlet; and Group C (mobile app CDST) had access to the mobile app on a handheld device for use during the Post-test. Test scores and time required to complete each test were recorded.
Pediatric dentists scored significantly higher and required less time on both the Pre-test (P < .001) and Post-test (P < .05) compared to dental students. Dental students and pediatric dentists who had access to the mobile app CDST scored significantly higher (P < .05) in the Post-test compared to the control and the print CDST groups. Post-test time for the dental students in the mobile app group was significantly longer (P < .001) compared to the control and print format.
Expert pediatric dentists demonstrated greater knowledge of dental trauma compared to novice clinicians. The mobile app clinical decision support tool was a more effective means of improving the diagnosis and management of traumatic dental injuries by both dental students and pediatric dentists than the print CDST.
背景/目的:研究表明,许多牙科专业学生和普通牙医在治疗遭受牙外伤的儿童方面知识不足。本研究的目的是评估新手临床医生和专业儿科牙医的牙外伤知识,并确定临床决策支持工具(CDST)在处理外伤情况方面的有效性。第二个目的是比较CDST的纸质版和移动应用程序格式的效果。
基于当前美国儿科学会牙科学会(AAPD)和国际牙外伤协会(IADT)的临床指南开发了纸质版和移动应用程序CDST。使用多项选择题预测试评估牙科专业学生(n = 84)和儿科牙医(n = 60)的基线知识。使用后测试评估参与者随机分为3组后的知识水平变化:A组(对照组)未提供CDST;B组(纸质版CDST)可获取纸质宣传册;C组(移动应用程序CDST)可在手持设备上使用移动应用程序,以便在后测试期间使用。记录测试分数和完成每次测试所需的时间。
与牙科专业学生相比,儿科牙医在预测试(P <.001)和后测试(P <.05)中的得分均显著更高,且所需时间更少。与对照组和纸质版CDST组相比,使用移动应用程序CDST的牙科专业学生和儿科牙医在后测试中的得分显著更高(P <.05)。与对照组和纸质版相比,移动应用程序组中牙科专业学生的后测试时间显著更长(P <.001)。
与新手临床医生相比,专业儿科牙医对牙外伤的知识更丰富。移动应用程序临床决策支持工具比纸质版CDST更有效地提高了牙科专业学生和儿科牙医对牙外伤的诊断和处理能力。