Rocco Paolo, Selletti Sonia, Minghetti Paola
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, via G. Colombo, 71, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Law Firm Studio Legale Astolfi e Associati, Via Larga, 8, 20122, Milan, Italy.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2018 Apr;55:93-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
Unlike generics, biosimilars are similar, but not equivalent, to the reference biological medicinal product. Therefore, if a patient experiences an adverse event, or a loss of efficacy, when transitioned to a biosimilar, the distribution of medical liability will be different from the case of both the originator and generics. Moreover, the case of naïve patients is different from that of non-naïve patients. In the case of naïve patients, physicians make their choice from a range of medicinal products that pose the same risk, since it is not possible to know with any certainty the patients' response to each therapeutic option until they have taken the drug. If physicians, instead, switch to a biosimilar for a patient already in treatment with the originator, they are switching from an option where the individual response is known, to an option where it is unknown. Given the evolving framework of biosimilar legislation, sharing choices with patients and obtaining their informed consent when switching to a biosimilar could represent an effective approach on the part of the prescribing physician. Moreover, a supranational database containing real-life data about patients in treatment with biological medicines, including information on the actual biological medicinal products administered, could complement the data obtained from clinical studies.
与仿制药不同,生物类似药与参比生物制品相似,但并不等同。因此,如果患者在转换使用生物类似药时出现不良事件或疗效丧失,医疗责任的分配将不同于原研药和仿制药的情况。此外,初治患者的情况与非初治患者不同。对于初治患者,医生是在一系列具有相同风险的药品中进行选择,因为在患者服用药物之前,无法确切知道他们对每种治疗选择的反应。相反,如果医生将正在使用原研药治疗的患者转换为使用生物类似药,他们是从已知个体反应的选择转换到未知个体反应的选择。鉴于生物类似药法规框架不断演变,与患者分享选择并在转换使用生物类似药时获得他们的知情同意,可能是开处方医生的一种有效方法。此外,一个包含生物药治疗患者真实生活数据的跨国数据库,包括所使用的实际生物制品信息,可以补充从临床研究中获得的数据。