Suppr超能文献

在体和体外研究镍钛机动器械与手动不锈钢器械用于根管治疗的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

In Vivo and In Vitro Effectiveness of Rotary Nickel-Titanium vs Manual Stainless Steel Instruments for Root Canal Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Oral Health and Society Research, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Division of Prosthodontics and Dental Geriatrics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018 Mar;18(1):59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files compared to stainless-steel (SST) hand files.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed on Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Scopus databases up to February 2016. An additional hand searching was performed in 13 journals. The studies were classified according to study type and the outcome variables. Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, extracted data, and three reviewers independently assessed the quality of the evidence of each included study according to The Cochrane Collaboration's procedures. A meta-analysis was performed whenever it was possible.

RESULTS

The electronic and hand search strategies yielded 1155 references of studies after removal of duplicates. Four clinical studies (two prospective and two retrospective studies) and 18 in vitro studies (on extracted teeth) were included for the qualitative synthesis after full-text evaluation of the eligible studies. The overall level of methodological quality of the studies included can be considered inadequate. Only one clinical study was judged at low risk of bias, whereas most non-clinical studies had a low risk of bias. Three meta-analyses, based on a very limited number of studies, could be performed. Each meta-analysis contained two studies. Of these, one meta-analysis was based on clinical studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review suggested that NiTi rotary instruments were associated with lower canal transportation and apical extrusion when compared to SST hand files, whereas both groups had similar outcomes in terms of success of therapy, amount of residual bacteria, and cleansing ability after treatment. However, due to the limited evidence available, these results should be interpreted with caution. Consequently, more randomized control trials using standardized protocols are needed in order to provide more solid recommendations.

摘要

简介

本系统评价评估了镍钛(NiTi)旋转锉与不锈钢(SST)手用锉在疗效上的差异。

方法

对 Medline、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和 Scopus 数据库进行电子检索,检索时间截至 2016 年 2 月。另外还在 13 种期刊中进行了手工检索。研究根据研究类型和结局变量进行分类。两位审查员独立应用纳入和排除标准,提取数据,三位审查员独立根据 Cochrane 协作的程序评估每个纳入研究的证据质量。只要有可能,就进行荟萃分析。

结果

电子和手工检索策略在去除重复项后得到了 1155 篇研究的参考文献。经过对合格研究的全文评估,有 4 项临床研究(2 项前瞻性研究和 2 项回顾性研究)和 18 项离体研究(针对已拔出的牙齿)纳入定性综合分析。纳入研究的整体方法学质量水平可认为是不充分的。只有一项临床研究被判断为低偏倚风险,而大多数非临床研究则为低偏倚风险。有 3 项荟萃分析,基于非常有限数量的研究,可以进行。每项荟萃分析包含两项研究。其中一项荟萃分析基于临床研究。

结论

本系统评价的结果表明,与 SST 手用锉相比,NiTi 旋转锉与较低的根管偏移和根尖挤出有关,而两组在治疗成功率、治疗后残留细菌量和清洁能力方面的结果相似。然而,由于现有证据有限,这些结果应谨慎解释。因此,需要更多使用标准化方案的随机对照试验,以提供更可靠的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验