• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助放化疗在临床 T2N0M0 食管癌中的作用:基于人群的队列研究。

Role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in clinical T2N0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;44(5):620-625. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.005
PMID:29478739
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this population-based cohort study was to determine whether the addition of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) to surgery is associated with improved pathologic outcomes and survival in patients with cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent nCRT followed by surgery or surgery alone for cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer were identified from The Netherlands Cancer Registry database (2005-2014). Accuracy of clinical staging was assessed using the resection specimen as gold standard. After propensity score matching, influences of both treatment strategies on radical resection (R0) rates and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

In total 533 patients were included; 353 underwent nCRT followed by surgery and 180 underwent surgery alone. In the nCRT group 32% of patients achieved a pathologic complete response. Clinical understaging was observed in 62% of the patients in the surgery alone group based on pT-stage (n = 30, 27%), pN-stage (n = 26, 23%), or both (n = 55, 50%). Propensity score matching resulted in 78 patients who underwent nCRT plus surgery versus 78 who underwent surgery alone. In the nCRT group radical resections were more frequently observed (99% vs. 89% p = 0.031) and resulted in improved 5-year overall survival (46% vs. 33%, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, clinical staging of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer was highly inaccurate. Compared to surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with higher radical resection rates and improved overall survival.

摘要

背景

本基于人群的队列研究旨在确定新辅助放化疗(nCRT)联合手术与 cT2N0M0 食管癌患者改善病理结果和生存的相关性。

方法

从荷兰癌症登记数据库(2005-2014 年)中确定接受 nCRT 联合手术或单纯手术治疗 cT2N0M0 食管癌的患者。以切除标本为金标准评估临床分期的准确性。经过倾向评分匹配后,比较两种治疗策略对根治性切除(R0)率和总生存率的影响。

结果

共纳入 533 例患者;353 例行 nCRT 联合手术,180 例行单纯手术。在 nCRT 组中,32%的患者达到病理完全缓解。单纯手术组中,62%的患者基于 pT 分期(n=30,27%)、pN 分期(n=26,23%)或两者(n=55,50%)存在临床低估。经过倾向评分匹配,78 例患者接受 nCRT 联合手术,78 例患者接受单纯手术。nCRT 组中,根治性切除更为常见(99%比 89%,p=0.031),5 年总生存率更高(46%比 33%,p=0.017)。

结论

在本基于人群的研究中,cT2N0M0 食管癌的临床分期高度不准确。与单纯手术相比,新辅助放化疗与更高的根治性切除率和改善的总生存率相关。

相似文献

1
Role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in clinical T2N0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based cohort study.新辅助放化疗在临床 T2N0M0 食管癌中的作用:基于人群的队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;44(5):620-625. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
2
Treatment of clinical T2N0M0 esophageal cancer.临床T2N0M0期食管癌的治疗
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3739-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3929-6. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
3
Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis comparing toxicity, pathologic outcome, and survival.食管癌或胃食管交界腺癌围手术期化疗与新辅助放化疗的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析,比较毒性、病理结果和生存率。
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;115(7):812-820. doi: 10.1002/jso.24596. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
4
Reliability of clinical nodal status regarding response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with surgery alone and prognosis in esophageal cancer patients.临床淋巴结状态与单纯手术相比对新辅助放化疗反应及食管癌患者预后的可靠性。
Acta Oncol. 2019 Nov;58(11):1640-1647. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1648865. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Overall Survival in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Population-based Cohort Study in the Netherlands.新辅助放化疗联合食管癌切除术治疗癌症患者的淋巴结清扫数目对总生存率的影响:荷兰基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):863-869. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002389.
6
Different recurrence pattern after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to surgery alone in esophageal cancer patients.与单纯手术相比,新辅助放化疗后的食管癌患者具有不同的复发模式。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;20(12):4008-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3102-7. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
7
Residual esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy frequently involves the mucosa and submucosa.新辅助放化疗后残留食管癌常累及黏膜和黏膜下层。
Ann Surg. 2013 Nov;258(5):678-88; discussion 688-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6191d.
8
Optimal timing for prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with esophageal cancer.用扩散加权 MRI 预测食管癌新辅助放化疗病理完全缓解的最佳时机。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):1896-1907. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06513-0. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
9
A retrospective comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced esophageal cancer.局部晚期食管癌新辅助放化疗方案的回顾性比较
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jul 1;30(7):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox025.
10
Delaying surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy does not significantly influence postoperative morbidity or oncological outcome in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma.新辅助放化疗后延迟手术对食管腺癌患者术后发病率或肿瘤学结局无显著影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;42(8):1183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.033. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjuvant Therapy after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?: Multi-institution Worldwide Observational Study.食管癌切除术后的辅助治疗:谁需要它?全球多机构观察性研究
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Oct 15;5(4):e497. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000497. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Predictors of Understaging with EUS and PET-CECT in Early Esophageal Carcinoma.早期食管癌中超声内镜(EUS)和正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET-CECT)分期过低的预测因素
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Dec 11;56(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01147-y.
3
Comparison of long-term survival of neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery versus upfront surgery and the role of adjuvant therapy for T1b-2N0-1 esophageal cancer: a population study of the SEER database and Chinese cohort.
新辅助治疗加手术与直接手术的长期生存率比较及辅助治疗在T1b-2N0-1期食管癌中的作用:一项基于SEER数据库和中国队列的人群研究
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):70-79. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001886.
4
CT radiomics in the identification of preoperative understaging in patients with clinical stage T1-2N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.CT影像组学在临床分期为T1-2N0的食管鳞状细胞癌患者术前分期不足的识别中的应用
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):7996-8008. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-275. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
5
Adjuvant Therapy After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?新辅助治疗后食管癌的辅助治疗:谁需要?
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):e240-e249. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005679. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
6
Optimal Treatment of cT2N0 Esophageal Carcinoma: Is Upfront Surgery Really the Way?cT2N0 期食管鳞癌的最佳治疗策略:前路手术真的是首选吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8387-8397. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10194-9. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
7
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node-negative esophageal carcinoma.新辅助放化疗联合手术对比单纯手术治疗临床淋巴结阴性食管癌。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Sep;11(9):2618-2629. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13586. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Patterns of Use of Induction Therapy for T2N0 Esophageal Cancer.T2N0 期食管癌诱导治疗的应用模式。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Feb;111(2):440-447. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.089. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Predicting lymph node metastases with endoscopic resection in cT2N0M0 oesophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.cT2N0M0期食管癌内镜切除术后淋巴结转移的预测:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Feb;8(1):35-43. doi: 10.1177/2050640619879007. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
10
Consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Oesophageal Cancer Study Group on the diagnosis, staging and management of oesophageal cancer.希腊和塞浦路斯食管癌研究小组关于食管癌诊断、分期和管理的共识声明。
Updates Surg. 2019 Dec;71(4):599-624. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00696-3. Epub 2019 Dec 2.