de Sá A B, Oliveira L C, Camilo R, Pierotti F F, Solé D
Division of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina-Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 May;50(3):135-138. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.52. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
Microarray technique employing molecular allergens is pointed out as a new method to evaluate allergic patients. To evaluate if microarray technique (ImmunoCAP-ISAC®; I-ISAC®) is similar to fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA; ImmunoCAP®) in the diagnosis of latex allergy (specific IgE to latex plus symptoms) and latex sensitization (only antibody) in pediatric (9-mo to 14-yrs) patients with myelomeningocele undergone to surgical repair. Patients underwent skin prick testing (SPT) to latex and food (prick to prick), and dosage of serum specific IgE to latex and recombinant latex allergens (rHev b 1, rHev b 3, rHev b 5, rHev b 6.01, rHev b 6.02, rHev b 8, rHev b 9, and rHev b 11) by ImmunoCAP® and I-ISAC®. The comparison between the two methods showed high level of concordance considering positive and negative results. A statistically significant correlation for rHev b 3 and rHev b 6.01 for the allergic patients, and for rHev b5 and rHev b6.01 for those sensitized to latex, was observed. I-ISAC® is limited to 5 recombinant latex allergens (rHev b 1, 3, 5, 6.01 and 8). Despite the presence of antibodies against pollens, LTP and profilins (I-ISAC®) in some patients, none of them reported symptoms related with intake of fruits and/or vegetables. Both methods are effective in assisting the diagnosis of latex allergy, but differ in the assessment of sensitized pediatric patients with myelomeningocele. The assessment of latex sensitized patients is more complete using the 8 recombinant latex fractions available for ImmunoCAP®, instead of I-ISAC®.
采用分子变应原的微阵列技术被指出是评估过敏患者的一种新方法。为了评估微阵列技术(免疫捕获过敏原芯片系统®;I-ISAC®)在诊断患有脊髓脊膜膨出并接受手术修复的儿科(9个月至14岁)患者的乳胶过敏(对乳胶的特异性IgE加上症状)和乳胶致敏(仅抗体)方面是否与荧光酶免疫测定法(FEIA;免疫捕获®)相似。患者接受了对乳胶和食物的皮肤点刺试验(点对点),并通过免疫捕获®和I-ISAC®测定血清中对乳胶和重组乳胶变应原(rHev b 1、rHev b 3、rHev b 5、rHev b 6.01、rHev b 6.02、rHev b 8、rHev b 9和rHev b 11)的特异性IgE剂量。两种方法之间的比较显示,考虑到阳性和阴性结果,一致性水平较高。观察到过敏患者中rHev b 3和rHev b 6.01之间以及乳胶致敏患者中rHev b5和rHev b6.01之间存在统计学显著相关性。I-ISAC®仅限于5种重组乳胶变应原(rHev b 1、3、5、6.01和8)。尽管一些患者存在针对花粉、脂质转移蛋白和肌动蛋白结合蛋白(I-ISAC®)的抗体,但他们中没有人报告与摄入水果和/或蔬菜相关的症状。两种方法在辅助诊断乳胶过敏方面均有效,但在评估患有脊髓脊膜膨出的致敏儿科患者方面存在差异。使用免疫捕获®可用的8种重组乳胶组分评估乳胶致敏患者比使用I-ISAC®更全面。