• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在比利时改革重大创伤患者护理组织的必要性:对行政数据库的分析。

Evaluating the need to reform the organisation of care for major trauma patients in Belgium: an analysis of administrative databases.

机构信息

Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Centre, Kruidtuinlaan 55, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Oct;45(5):885-892. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0932-9. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-018-0932-9
PMID:29480321
Abstract

PURPOSE

In light of the international evolutions to establish inclusive trauma systems and to concentrate the care for the most severely injured in major trauma centres, we evaluated the degree of dispersion of trauma care in Belgium.

METHODS

We used descriptive statistics to illustrate the dispersion of major trauma care in Belgium based on two independent administrative databases: the registry of Mobile Intensive Care Units (2009-2015) and the Belgian Hospital Discharge Dataset (2009-2014).

RESULTS

Patients with a severe trauma (n = 3856 in 2015) were transported towards 145 different hospital sites (on a total of 198 hospital sites) resulting in a median of 17 cases per hospital site (min = 1; P25 = 4; P75 = 30; max = 165). A minority of major trauma patients is after admission transferred to another hospital (8%) with a median of 10 days after admission to the hospital (IQR 3.5-24).

CONCLUSIONS

The dispersion of care for major trauma patients in Belgium is so high that a reorganisation of care for severe injured patients in major trauma centres concentrating professional expertise and specialised equipment is recommended to guarantee a high quality of care in a qualitative and sustainable way.

摘要

目的

鉴于国际上建立包容性创伤系统的发展趋势,并将最严重创伤患者的救治集中在大型创伤中心,我们评估了比利时创伤救治的分散程度。

方法

我们使用描述性统计方法,基于两个独立的行政数据库,即移动重症监护病房登记处(2009-2015 年)和比利时医院出院数据集(2009-2014 年),来展示比利时大型创伤救治的分散程度。

结果

2015 年有 3856 名严重创伤患者被送往 145 个不同的医院,导致每个医院的中位数为 17 例(最小值=1;P25=4;P75=30;最大值=165)。少数大型创伤患者在入院后会被转移到另一家医院(8%),入院后中位数为 10 天(IQR 3.5-24)。

结论

比利时大型创伤患者救治的分散程度如此之高,建议对严重创伤患者的救治进行重新组织,集中专业知识和专业设备,以有质量且可持续的方式保证高质量的救治。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the need to reform the organisation of care for major trauma patients in Belgium: an analysis of administrative databases.评估在比利时改革重大创伤患者护理组织的必要性:对行政数据库的分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Oct;45(5):885-892. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0932-9. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
2
Definitive care in level 3 trauma centres after severe injury: A comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes.重伤后三级创伤中心的确定性治疗:临床特征与结局比较
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1790-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.047. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
3
Evaluating potential spatial access to trauma center care by severely injured patients.评估严重创伤患者获得创伤中心治疗的潜在空间可达性。
Health Place. 2013 Jan;19:131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
4
Reference centres for adults with rare and complex cancers - Policy recommendations to improve the organisation of care in Belgium.比利时罕见和复杂癌症成人患者参考中心——改善护理组织的政策建议。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2016 Feb;64(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
5
Trauma care in Scotland: The role of major trauma centres, trauma units, and local emergency hospitals.苏格兰的创伤护理:主要创伤中心、创伤单元及当地急诊医院的作用。
Surgeon. 2016 Oct;14(5):241-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
6
Direct transport to tertiary trauma centers versus transfer from lower level facilities: impact on mortality and morbidity among patients with major trauma.直接转运至三级创伤中心与从较低级别医疗机构转运:对严重创伤患者死亡率和发病率的影响。
J Trauma. 1997 Aug;43(2):288-95; discussion 295-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199708000-00014.
7
Paediatric trauma systems and their impact on the health outcomes of severely injured children: An integrative review.儿科创伤系统及其对重伤儿童健康结局的影响:一项综合综述。
Injury. 2016 Mar;47(3):574-85. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.028. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
8
Improving patient experience and outcomes following serious injury.改善重伤后的患者体验及治疗效果。
N Z Med J. 2019 May 3;132(1494):15-25.
9
Trauma patient discharge and care transition experiences: Identifying opportunities for quality improvement in trauma centres.创伤患者出院及护理过渡经历:确定创伤中心质量改进的机会。
Injury. 2018 Jan;49(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.028. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Trauma centre patient volume and inpatient mortality risk reconsidered.创伤中心患者数量与住院死亡率风险再探讨。
Injury. 2016 May;47(5):1072-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Trauma systems: a global comparison.创伤系统:全球比较
OTA Int. 2025 May 2;8(3 Suppl):e376. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000376. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Traumatic brain injury hospitalizations in Belgium: A brief overview of incidence, population characteristics, and outcomes.比利时创伤性脑损伤住院患者:发病率、人口特征和结局简述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 8;10:916133. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.916133. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of a nurse-led transitional burns rehabilitation programme (4Cs-TBuRP) for adult burn survivors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Injury Outcomes Across Canadian Trauma Systems.加拿大创伤系统中创伤结局的变化趋势。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):168-174. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4212.
2
Major trauma mortality in rural and metropolitan NSW, 2009-2014: a retrospective analysis of trauma registry data.2009-2014 年新南威尔士州农村和城市地区重大创伤死亡率:创伤登记数据的回顾性分析。
Med J Aust. 2016 Nov 7;205(9):403-407. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00406.
3
Trauma care in Scotland: The role of major trauma centres, trauma units, and local emergency hospitals.苏格兰的创伤护理:主要创伤中心、创伤单元及当地急诊医院的作用。
护士主导的成人烧伤幸存者过渡性烧伤康复计划(4Cs-TBuRP)的效果:一项随机对照试验的方案
Trials. 2021 Oct 13;22(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05679-7.
4
Varying viewpoints of Belgian stakeholders on models of interhospital collaboration.比利时利益相关者对医院间协作模式的不同观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):942. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3763-9.
Surgeon. 2016 Oct;14(5):241-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
4
Regionalisation of trauma care in Germany: the "TraumaNetwork DGU(®)-Project".德国创伤护理的区域化:“创伤网络德国创伤外科学会(®)项目”
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Feb;38(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/s00068-011-0166-6. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
5
The outcome of trauma patients with do-not-resuscitate orders.有不进行心肺复苏医嘱的创伤患者的治疗结果。
J Surg Res. 2016 Feb;200(2):631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
6
Access to specialist care: Optimizing the geographic configuration of trauma systems.获得专科护理:优化创伤系统的地理配置。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Nov;79(5):756-65. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000827.
7
Implementing Major Trauma Audit in Ireland.在爱尔兰实施重大创伤审计。
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):166-72. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
8
The view of severely burned patients and healthcare professionals on the blind spots in the aftercare process: a qualitative study.严重烧伤患者和医护人员对康复护理过程中盲点的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 1;15:302. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0973-2.
9
Association between volume of severely injured patients and mortality in German trauma hospitals.德国创伤医院中重伤患者数量与死亡率之间的关联。
Br J Surg. 2015 Sep;102(10):1213-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9866. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
10
Comparative study of ED mortality risk of US trauma patients treated at level I and level II vs nontrauma centers.美国一级和二级创伤中心与非创伤中心治疗的创伤患者急诊死亡率风险的比较研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;33(9):1158-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 16.