Pirlich Markus, Horn Iris-Susanne, Mozet Christian, Pirlich Mandy, Dietz Andreas, Fischer Miloš
Clinic of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Head Medicine and Oral Health, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Clinic of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Schwarzwald-Baar Hospital, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May;275(5):1219-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4908-5. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
The use of the radial forearm-free flap is a well-established and reliable reconstruction method in head and neck surgery. Usually, the defect of the donor site is covered with full or split-thickness skin grafts. Since 09/2013, a direct closure of the radial forearm donor site has been performed at the ENT University Hospital Leipzig to avoid secondary donor site morbidity. However, few data are available in the literature on long-term cosmetic and functional results compared to the established indirect donor site defect coverage.
This study investigated patients with radial forearm-free flap harvest from 01/2012 until 03/2015. A total of n = 39 patients were included, with n = 18 being operated by indirect (group 1) and n = 21 by direct closure technique (group 2). For the validation of surgical revisions and wound healing disorders, we carried out clinical investigations as well as interviews. The "POSAS Observer and Patient Scale" was used for assessing the cosmetic outcome and the "Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ)" for functional criteria.
Group 2 showed an increased rate of wound healing problems, however it was not statistically different compared to group 1. Revision surgery was necessary in both groups only each in one case. Using the POSAS, there were no significant differences between both groups in the observer scale for the items vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and even for pain, scar itching, color, stiffness, thickness and relief in the patient scale. The functional results (MHOQ) also showed no significantly inferior results for group 2.
The direct closure procedure is quick, simple and can be performed without secondary donor site morbidity. For wound healing, cosmetic and function of the forearm and hand, no inferior results can be measured for the direct procedure compared to the indirect coverage technique.
在头颈外科手术中,游离桡侧前臂皮瓣的应用是一种成熟且可靠的重建方法。通常,供区缺损采用全厚或中厚皮片移植覆盖。自2013年9月起,莱比锡大学耳鼻喉科医院开始对桡侧前臂供区进行直接缝合,以避免供区出现二期并发症。然而,与已确立的间接供区缺损覆盖方法相比,关于长期美容和功能效果的文献资料较少。
本研究调查了2012年1月至2015年3月期间采用游离桡侧前臂皮瓣的患者。共纳入39例患者,其中18例采用间接法手术(第1组),21例采用直接缝合技术(第2组)。为验证手术修复情况和伤口愈合障碍,我们进行了临床检查和访谈。使用“POSAS观察者和患者量表”评估美容效果,使用“密歇根手部结局问卷(MHQ)”评估功能标准。
第2组伤口愈合问题发生率有所增加,但与第1组相比无统计学差异。两组均仅各有1例需要进行修复手术。使用POSAS量表,在观察者量表中,两组在血管分布、色素沉着、厚度、起伏、柔韧性、表面积等项目上以及在患者量表中在疼痛、瘢痕瘙痒、颜色、僵硬、厚度和起伏等方面均无显著差异。功能结果(MHOQ)显示第2组也没有明显较差的结果。
直接缝合手术快速、简单,且不会导致供区出现二期并发症。在前臂和手部的伤口愈合、美容和功能方面,与间接覆盖技术相比,直接手术方法并未显示出较差的结果。