针刺疗法联合运动疗法治疗肩峰下疼痛综合征的成本效果评价:来自一项随机临床试验的证据。
Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of the Inclusion of Dry Needling into an Exercise Program for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: Evidence from a Randomized Clinical Trial.
机构信息
Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
Cátedra de Investigación y Docencia en Fisioterapia: Terapia Manual y Punción Seca, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
出版信息
Pain Med. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):2336-2347. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny021.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the inclusion of trigger point-dry needling (TrP-DN) into an exercise program for the management of subacromial pain syndrome.
METHODS
Fifty patients with unilateral subacromial pain syndrome were randomized with concealed allocation to exercise alone or exercise plus TrP-DN. Both groups were asked to perform an exercise program targeting the rotator cuff musculature twice daily for five weeks. Patients allocated to the exercise plus TrP-DN group also received dry needling during the second and fourth sessions. Societal costs and health-related quality of life (estimated by EuroQol-5D-5L) over a one-year follow-up were used to generate incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) ratios for each intervention.
RESULTS
Intention-to-treat analysis was possible for 48 (96%) of the participants. Those in the exercise group made more visits to medical doctors and received a greater number of other treatments (P < 0.001). The major contributor to societal costs (77%) was the absenteeism paid labor in favor of the exercise plus TrP-DN group (P = 0.03). The combination of exercise plus TrP-DN was less costly (mean difference cost/patient = €517.34, P = 0.003) than exercise alone. Incremental QALYs showed greater benefit for exercise plus TrP-DN (difference = 2.87, 95% confidence interval = 2.85-2.89). Therefore, the inclusion of TrP-DN into an exercise program was more likely to be cost-effective than an exercise program alone, with 99.5% of the iterations falling in the dominant area.
CONCLUSIONS
The inclusion of TrP-DN into an exercise program was more cost-effective for individuals with subacromial pain syndrome than exercise alone. From a cost-benefit perspective, the inclusion of TrP-DN into multimodal management of patients with subacromial pain syndrome should be considered.
目的
评估将触发点干针(TrP-DN)纳入肩部撞击综合征管理的运动方案中的成本效益。
方法
将 50 例单侧肩峰下疼痛综合征患者随机分为单纯运动组或运动加 TrP-DN 组,两组均要求每天两次进行针对肩袖肌肉的运动方案,持续五周。接受运动加 TrP-DN 组的患者在第二次和第四次治疗时还接受了干针治疗。在一年的随访期间,使用社会成本和健康相关生活质量(通过 EuroQol-5D-5L 估计)来生成每种干预措施的每质量调整生命年(QALY)增量成本比。
结果
48 名(96%)参与者进行了意向治疗分析。运动组患者就诊次数更多,接受的其他治疗更多(P<0.001)。社会成本的主要贡献者(77%)是缺勤带薪劳动力,有利于运动加 TrP-DN 组(P=0.03)。运动加 TrP-DN 的组合成本更低(每位患者的平均差异成本=517.34 欧元,P=0.003)。增量 QALYs 显示运动加 TrP-DN 的获益更大(差异=2.87,95%置信区间=2.85-2.89)。因此,与单独运动方案相比,将 TrP-DN 纳入运动方案更有可能具有成本效益,99.5%的迭代结果处于优势区域。
结论
与单独运动方案相比,将 TrP-DN 纳入肩部撞击综合征患者的运动方案更具成本效益。从成本效益的角度来看,应考虑将 TrP-DN 纳入肩部撞击综合征患者的多模式管理。